StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Microsoft Teams vs Openfire

Microsoft Teams vs Openfire

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Openfire
Openfire
Stacks12
Followers47
Votes0
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144

Microsoft Teams vs Openfire: What are the differences?

Introduction

Microsoft Teams and Openfire are two popular communication platforms used by businesses and organizations to enhance collaboration and productivity. While both serve the purpose of facilitating communication and teamwork, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture and Deployment: Microsoft Teams is a cloud-based platform that operates on the Microsoft Azure infrastructure, offering a highly scalable and secure environment. On the other hand, Openfire is an open-source instant messaging and group chat server that requires local installation and setup, making it more suitable for organizations that prefer on-premises deployment and have the resources to manage it.

  2. Integration and Ecosystem: Microsoft Teams integrates seamlessly with various Microsoft Office applications, including Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, enabling users to collaborate on documents within the platform. It also offers a wide range of third-party app integrations through its Microsoft AppSource marketplace. In contrast, Openfire offers limited integration options and has a smaller ecosystem, primarily relying on plugins developed by the community.

  3. Voice and Video Calling: Microsoft Teams provides robust voice and video calling capabilities, allowing users to make high-quality audio and video calls within the platform. It also supports scheduled and ad-hoc meetings with screen sharing and collaboration features. Openfire, on the other hand, does not offer built-in voice and video calling features and requires additional plugins or integrations to enable such functionality.

  4. Chat and Collaboration Features: Microsoft Teams offers a comprehensive set of features for chat and collaboration, including individual and group chats, file sharing, co-authoring, threaded conversations, and the ability to create dedicated channels for different teams or projects. Openfire provides basic group chat functionality but lacks some advanced features like threaded conversations and dedicated channels.

  5. Security and Compliance: Microsoft Teams is designed with enterprise-level security measures, such as data encryption in transit and at rest, multi-factor authentication, and compliance with various industry standards and regulations, including GDPR and ISO standards. Openfire, being an open-source platform, may require additional security configurations and customization to match the security requirements of an organization.

  6. Administration and Management: Microsoft Teams offers a user-friendly administrative interface, enabling IT administrators to manage users, permissions, and settings centrally. It also provides detailed analytics and reporting capabilities for monitoring usage and performance. Openfire, while offering administration features, may require more technical expertise and manual configuration for user management and system maintenance.

In summary, Microsoft Teams and Openfire differ in terms of their architecture and deployment options, integration and ecosystem, voice and video calling capabilities, chat and collaboration features, security and compliance measures, and administration and management capabilities. Organizations should consider their specific needs and preferences to choose the most suitable platform for their communication and collaboration requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Openfire, Microsoft Teams

Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Openfire
Openfire
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

It is a real time collaboration (RTC) server. It uses the only widely adopted open protocol for instant messaging, XMPP (also called Jabber). It is incredibly easy to setup and administer, but offers rock-solid security and performance.

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Instant messaging; Rock-solid security and performance; Easy to setup
All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
Stacks
12
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
47
Followers
1.7K
Votes
0
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
IPFS
IPFS
macOS
macOS
drawio
drawio
Skype
Skype

What are some alternatives to Openfire, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack