StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Minio vs Storj

Minio vs Storj

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Minio
Minio
Stacks637
Followers670
Votes43
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks6.4K
Storj
Storj
Stacks23
Followers41
Votes23
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Minio vs Storj: What are the differences?

Introduction

Minio and Storj are both cloud storage platforms that provide object storage capabilities. Although they share similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Data Security: One major difference between Minio and Storj is the approach to data security. Minio allows users to utilize their own encryption keys, providing full control and ownership of their data. On the other hand, Storj utilizes client-side encryption and sharding, distributing encrypted data across multiple nodes. This provides a higher level of data security and privacy.

  2. Business Model: Another difference lies in the business model. Minio is an open-source software solution that can be self-hosted and deployed on-premises or in the cloud. It can also be used as a managed service provided by Minio Inc. On the other hand, Storj operates as a decentralized storage network, leveraging spare storage space from individual users who earn tokens in return. This decentralized model can provide a more cost-effective and scalable solution.

  3. Storage Architecture: Minio is designed as an object storage server that emulates Amazon S3 API, making it compatible with existing S3 applications. It provides a simple and scalable storage solution. In contrast, Storj adopts a distributed architecture that breaks files into smaller pieces and distributes them across multiple nodes in the network. This allows for faster and more efficient data retrieval.

  4. Data Availability: Minio guarantees high availability by using erasure coding and replication techniques to ensure data durability. However, the availability of data depends on the deployment model chosen by the user. Storj, on the other hand, relies on an incentivized network of storage nodes, where data redundancy is achieved by distributing file pieces across multiple independent nodes. This decentralized architecture enhances data availability even in the event of node failures.

  5. Pricing Model: Minio follows a pricing model based on a subscription for managed services or support offerings. The costs may vary depending on the deployment options and additional features. Storj, being a decentralized storage network, offers pricing based on the usage of storage space and data transfers. This can potentially be a cost-effective solution for users with varying storage and bandwidth requirements.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Minio benefits from a large and active open-source community, contributing to its continuous development and integration with other software applications. This enables users to leverage a variety of third-party integrations and plugins. Storj also has an active community of developers, but its focus on decentralized storage limits the integrations and ecosystem compared to Minio.

In summary, Minio provides greater control over data security, offers both self-hosted and managed options, and is compatible with existing S3 applications. Storj, on the other hand, utilizes a decentralized model for enhanced security, operates on a decentralized network, and offers a more cost-effective pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Minio
Minio
Storj
Storj

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

-
Performance; Security & Privacy; Durability; Open Source; Affordable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
6.4K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
637
Stacks
23
Followers
670
Followers
41
Votes
43
Votes
23
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups
  • 8
    S3 Compatible
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Lambda Compute
Cons
  • 3
    Deletion of huge buckets is not possible
Pros
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 3
    Decentralized
  • 2
    Easy Setup
  • 2
    Durability
  • 2
    Fast
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Apache CloudStack
Apache CloudStack
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront

What are some alternatives to Minio, Storj?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase