StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search Engines
  5. MkDocs vs Sphinx

MkDocs vs Sphinx

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sphinx
Sphinx
Stacks1.1K
Followers300
Votes32
MkDocs
MkDocs
Stacks167
Followers152
Votes14

MkDocs vs Sphinx: What are the differences?

Introduction

MkDocs and Sphinx are both popular documentation generators for creating websites. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

1. Markup Language Support: MkDocs uses Markdown as its default markup language, making it straightforward and easy to use. On the other hand, Sphinx supports reStructuredText as its primary markup language, which is more powerful but has a steeper learning curve.

2. Themes and Customization: MkDocs provides a limited number of themes, but they are highly customizable using CSS and Jinja2 templates, allowing for a personalized look and feel. Sphinx, on the other hand, offers a wide range of themes and templates out of the box, providing more pre-built options for customization.

3. Plugin Ecosystem: MkDocs has a smaller plugin ecosystem compared to Sphinx, limiting the extensibility and functionality that can be added. Sphinx, being more mature and widely adopted, offers a vast collection of plugins that enhance its capabilities, such as automatic API documentation generation and support for different programming languages.

4. Documentation Structure: MkDocs follows a simple folder-based documentation structure, where each Markdown file corresponds to a single page on the website. Sphinx, on the other hand, supports a more complex documentation structure, allowing for the creation of multiple pages per file and more extensive hierarchies.

5. Build Process and Output: MkDocs generates static HTML files, making it easy to deploy and host on various platforms without any additional dependencies. Sphinx, on the other hand, generates HTML files as well but also provides options for generating other output formats, such as PDF and ePub, giving more flexibility for multi-format publishing.

6. Community and Support: MkDocs has a growing community and provides decent support, but it may not be as extensive as Sphinx's large community and active development. Sphinx benefits from being used in many large-scale projects and has a dedicated team that continuously improves and maintains it.

In Summary, MkDocs and Sphinx differ in their markup language support, theme customization options, plugin ecosystems, documentation structures, build processes, and community support. Choose MkDocs for a simpler and lightweight documentation generator with Markdown support, or opt for Sphinx if you require more advanced features, extensive customization options, and a larger community presence.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sphinx
Sphinx
MkDocs
MkDocs

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Output formats: HTML (including Windows HTML Help), LaTeX (for printable PDF versions), ePub, Texinfo, manual pages, plain text;Extensive cross-references: semantic markup and automatic links for functions, classes, citations, glossary terms and similar pieces of information;Hierarchical structure: easy definition of a document tree, with automatic links to siblings, parents and children;Automatic indices: general index as well as a language-specific module indices;Code handling: automatic highlighting using the Pygments highlighter;Extensions: automatic testing of code snippets, inclusion of docstrings from Python modules (API docs), and more
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
167
Followers
300
Followers
152
Votes
32
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Fast
  • 9
    Simple deployment
  • 6
    Open source
  • 1
    Lots of extentions
Pros
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes
Cons
  • 1
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
Integrations
DevDocs
DevDocs
Zapier
Zapier
Google Drive
Google Drive
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Dropbox
Dropbox
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sphinx, MkDocs?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope