StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Mockito vs react-testing-library

Mockito vs react-testing-library

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
react-testing-library
react-testing-library
Stacks297
Followers156
Votes4

Mockito vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Mockito and React-Testing-Library

Mockito and React-Testing-Library are two popular tools used for testing in the development of software applications. While both serve the purpose of facilitating testing, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Mockito: Mockito is a mocking framework for Java that allows developers to create and configure mock objects for testing. It enables the simulation of dependencies, behaviors, and interactions of objects in a system. Mockito provides methods to mock and verify the behavior of various objects, making it ideal for unit testing.

  2. React-Testing-Library: React-Testing-Library, on the other hand, is a testing utility specifically designed for testing React applications. It focuses on testing user interactions with the components rather than implementation details. React-Testing-Library encourages testing components as users would experience them, by querying for elements and simulating user actions.

  3. Syntax: Mockito is used with Java and follows a syntax specific to the language. React-Testing-Library, as the name suggests, is used with React and utilizes JavaScript syntax. The choice between the two would depend on the programming language and framework being used for development.

  4. Testing Approach: Mockito is primarily used for mocking and verifying the behavior of objects, making it suitable for unit testing. React-Testing-Library, on the other hand, focuses on testing the actual user interactions with the components, ensuring that they function as expected from a user's perspective. This approach makes it more suitable for integration testing.

  5. Testing Levels: Mockito is commonly used for unit testing, where individual components and classes are isolated and tested in isolation. It is often used in conjunction with other testing frameworks or libraries to cover different aspects of a system. React-Testing-Library, however, is more commonly used for integration testing, where the interaction between different components and their behavior as a part of a larger system is tested.

  6. Development Stack: Mockito can be used with any Java development stack, as it is not specific to any particular framework. React-Testing-Library, on the other hand, is designed specifically for testing React applications and is used in conjunction with React testing frameworks like Jest.

In summary, Mockito is primarily focused on mocking and verifying object behavior in unit testing scenarios, while React-Testing-Library is designed for testing user interactions and component behavior in React applications at the integration testing level.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
react-testing-library
react-testing-library

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

-
light-weight solution for testing; React DOM testing utilities; works with any environment that provides DOM APIs;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
297
Followers
180
Followers
156
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    We can test behavior
  • 1
    Good documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Mockito, react-testing-library?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana