StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Moleculer vs Nameko

Moleculer vs Nameko

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468
Moleculer
Moleculer
Stacks59
Followers88
Votes14
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks597

Nameko vs Moleculer: What are the differences?

Developers describe Nameko as "Python microservices framework". Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events. On the other hand, Moleculer is detailed as "Fast & powerful microservices framework for NodeJS". It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Nameko and Moleculer can be primarily classified as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Some of the features offered by Nameko are:

  • Focus on business logic
  • Distributed and scalable
  • Extensible

On the other hand, Moleculer provides the following key features:

  • Blazing fast
  • Extensible
  • Open source

Nameko and Moleculer are both open source tools. Nameko with 3.02K GitHub stars and 302 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Moleculer with 2.85K GitHub stars and 252 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nameko, Moleculer

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nameko
Nameko
Moleculer
Moleculer

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Blazing fast; Extensible; Open source; Fault tolerance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
468
GitHub Forks
597
Stacks
20
Stacks
59
Followers
79
Followers
88
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Many integrations out of the box (db,messaging,tracing)
  • 3
    Typescript
  • 3
    Complete microservices ecosystem without lerning curve
  • 2
    Node.js
  • 2
    High performance
Integrations
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
MSSQL
MSSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to Nameko, Moleculer?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana