Monit vs Sensu

Overview

Sensu

Stacks201

Followers251

Votes56

GitHub Stars2.9K

Forks386

Monit

Stacks166

Followers54

Votes0

Monit vs Sensu: What are the differences?

Monit and Sensu are two popular monitoring tools used by developers and system administrators to ensure the smooth operation of their systems. Both tools offer unique features and functionalities that cater to different needs and preferences.

Architecture: Monit is a lightweight and easy-to-use monitoring tool that runs as a standalone daemon process on the monitored system. On the other hand, Sensu is a more complex and scalable monitoring tool that follows a client-server architecture, where clients send data to the central Sensu server for analysis and processing.
Customization: Monit provides a simple configuration file where users can define their monitoring rules using a straightforward syntax. In contrast, Sensu offers a high level of customization through plugins and checks, allowing users to extend its capabilities according to their requirements without modifying the core codebase.
Alerting: Monit primarily focuses on monitoring system resources and services, providing alerts through email notifications or custom scripts. Meanwhile, Sensu offers a more sophisticated alerting mechanism with support for integrations with various notification services like PagerDuty, Slack, and others, enhancing the overall alerting experience.
Scalability: Sensu is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to monitor thousands of nodes and services efficiently. Monit, on the other hand, is more suited for smaller setups or individual systems due to its limitations in handling large-scale monitoring configurations.
Community Support: Sensu boasts a vibrant and active community that continuously contributes plugins, extensions, and integrations to enhance its functionality. Monit, while popular, has a smaller user base and may have limited community support compared to Sensu.
Ease of Configuration: Monit is known for its simplicity and ease of configuration, making it ideal for users looking for a straightforward monitoring solution without complex setup procedures. Sensu, with its more intricate architecture and customization options, may require a steeper learning curve for beginners or less experienced users.

In Summary, Monit is a lightweight, easy-to-use monitoring tool with a simple setup, while Sensu offers a more complex, scalable solution with advanced customization options and extensive alerting capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sensu, Monit

Shoaib

Dec 23, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I have a simple script that dynamically spawns independent processes (through bash). Which tool should I use to monitor the spawned processes assuming I have the PIDs(/pid files) of the spawned processes? Monit seems to be useful for monitoring pre-configured processes but I need something for monitoring dynamic PID/PID files. Prometheus seems to be needing HTTP endpoints. A beginner

62.7k views62.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sensu	Monit
Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.	It can monitor and manage distributed computer systems, conduct automatic maintenance and repair and execute meaningful causal actions in error situations.
Health checks & custom metrics; alerts & incident management; real-time inventory; auto-remediation & custom workflows; container monitoring; Kubernetes monitoring; telemetry & service health checking; multi-cloud monitoring	Responsive UI; Control Services Remotely; Services Monitoring modes
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 386	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 201	Stacks 166
Followers 251	Followers 54
Votes 56	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Support for almost anything 11 Easy setup 9 Message routing 7 Devs can code their own checks 5 Ease of use Cons 1 Plugins 1 Written in Go	No community feedback yet
Integrations
ServiceNow.com Prometheus InfluxDB Grafana PagerDuty	Slack FreeBSD HipChat Pushover

What are some alternatives to Sensu, Monit?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Monit vs Sensu: What are the differences?

Architecture: Monit is a lightweight and easy-to-use monitoring tool that runs as a standalone daemon process on the monitored system. On the other hand, Sensu is a more complex and scalable monitoring tool that follows a client-server architecture, where clients send data to the central Sensu server for analysis and processing.
Customization: Monit provides a simple configuration file where users can define their monitoring rules using a straightforward syntax. In contrast, Sensu offers a high level of customization through plugins and checks, allowing users to extend its capabilities according to their requirements without modifying the core codebase.
Alerting: Monit primarily focuses on monitoring system resources and services, providing alerts through email notifications or custom scripts. Meanwhile, Sensu offers a more sophisticated alerting mechanism with support for integrations with various notification services like PagerDuty, Slack, and others, enhancing the overall alerting experience.
Scalability: Sensu is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to monitor thousands of nodes and services efficiently. Monit, on the other hand, is more suited for smaller setups or individual systems due to its limitations in handling large-scale monitoring configurations.
Community Support: Sensu boasts a vibrant and active community that continuously contributes plugins, extensions, and integrations to enhance its functionality. Monit, while popular, has a smaller user base and may have limited community support compared to Sensu.
Ease of Configuration: Monit is known for its simplicity and ease of configuration, making it ideal for users looking for a straightforward monitoring solution without complex setup procedures. Sensu, with its more intricate architecture and customization options, may require a steeper learning curve for beginners or less experienced users.

Monit vs Sensu

Overview