StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. MSMQ vs VerneMQ

MSMQ vs VerneMQ

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VerneMQ
VerneMQ
Stacks31
Followers136
Votes6
MSMQ
MSMQ
Stacks33
Followers118
Votes3

MSMQ vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of messaging systems, there are key differences between MSMQ (Microsoft Message Queuing) and VerneMQ. 1. Message Protocol Compatibility: MSMQ exclusively uses the Microsoft Message Queuing protocol, limiting its interoperability with non-Windows systems. On the other hand, VerneMQ supports various messaging protocols such as MQTT, WebSocket, and STOMP, enabling seamless communication across different platforms regardless of the underlying technology stack. 2. Open Source vs Proprietary: MSMQ is a proprietary technology developed by Microsoft, which may entail licensing costs for users. In contrast, VerneMQ is an open-source message broker, providing users with the freedom to modify and distribute the code according to their requirements without additional fees. 3. Scalability and Performance: VerneMQ is designed to be highly scalable and performant, capable of handling a large number of concurrent connections and messages efficiently. MSMQ, while suitable for smaller-scale deployments, may not offer the same level of scalability and performance as VerneMQ in more demanding environments. 4. Platform Independence: VerneMQ is platform-independent, meaning it can be deployed on various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS. In contrast, MSMQ is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system, limiting its deployment options to Windows environments only. 5. Community Support: VerneMQ benefits from a thriving open-source community that contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and additional resources. MSMQ, as a proprietary technology, may have limited community support compared to VerneMQ, potentially affecting the availability of resources for troubleshooting and optimization. 6. Integration Capabilities: VerneMQ offers robust integration capabilities with other systems and services through its support for standard protocols and APIs, facilitating seamless connectivity with a wide range of applications. On the other hand, MSMQ’s integration options may be more limited due to its reliance on the Microsoft Message Queuing protocol and proprietary technology stack.

In Summary, the key differences between MSMQ and VerneMQ lie in message protocol compatibility, licensing model, scalability, platform independence, community support, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VerneMQ
VerneMQ
MSMQ
MSMQ

VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP. It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications.

This technology enables applications running at different times to communicate across heterogeneous networks and systems that may be temporarily offline. Applications send messages to queues and read messages from queues.

Open Source, Apache 2 licensed; QoS 0, QoS 1, QoS 2; MQTT v5.0 fully implemented; Basic Authentication and Authorization; Bridge Support; $SYS Tree for monitoring and reporting; TLS (SSL) Encryption; Websockets Support; Cluster Support with sophisticated self-healing mechanisms; Queue Migration; Prometheus Monitoring; Logging (Console, Files, Syslog); Reporting to Graphite; Extensible Plugin architecture (Erlang, Elixir, Lua); WebHooks Plugins; Multiple Sessions per ClientId; Shared Subscriptions; Proxy Protocol v1, v2;
-
Statistics
Stacks
31
Stacks
33
Followers
136
Followers
118
Votes
6
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Open source shared subscriptions
  • 1
    Fully open source clustering
  • 1
    MQTT v5 implementation
  • 1
    Open Source Message and Metadata Persistence
  • 1
    Open Source Plugin System
Pros
  • 2
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Cloud not needed
Cons
  • 1
    Windows dependency
Integrations
MySQL
MySQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Memcached
Memcached
Redis
Redis
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to VerneMQ, MSMQ?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase