What is Nagios XI and what are its top alternatives?
Nagios XI is a popular and widely-used enterprise monitoring solution that allows users to monitor their entire IT infrastructure, including servers, applications, and services. Key features of Nagios XI include comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable dashboards, alerting and notification system, performance graphs, and easy integration with third-party tools. However, some limitations of Nagios XI include its complexity in setting up and configuring, high cost for commercial support, and lack of out-of-the-box automation features.
- Zabbix: Zabbix is an open-source monitoring solution that provides real-time monitoring, alerting, and visualization features. It offers a user-friendly web interface, distributed monitoring, flexible threshold-based alerting, and extensive reporting capabilities. Pros: Open-source and flexible. Cons: Steeper learning curve for beginners.
- Icinga: Icinga is an open-source monitoring tool that is a fork of Nagios and offers an improved user interface and more advanced features. It provides multi-tenancy support, REST API for integration, rich monitoring templates, and easily extensible through plugins. Pros: Modern interface and strong community support. Cons: It can be resource-intensive.
- Prometheus: Prometheus is a popular open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit that is especially well-suited for dynamic environments. It offers a time-series database, powerful query language, support for multi-dimensional data collection, and easy integration with Grafana for visualization. Pros: Scalable and efficient for cloud-native environments. Cons: Requires additional components for full functionality.
- SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor: SolarWinds NPM is a comprehensive network monitoring tool that provides deep visibility into network performance, traffic, and configuration. It offers automated network discovery, customizable alerts, network mapping, and detailed reporting. Pros: Easy to use and feature-rich. Cons: Expensive for larger environments.
- PRTG Network Monitor: PRTG is an all-in-one network monitoring solution that offers monitoring for networks, servers, applications, and devices. It provides customizable dashboards, detailed reports, automatic network mapping, and out-of-the-box monitoring templates. Pros: Intuitive interface and extensive sensor types. Cons: Limited free version with sensor restrictions.
- Opsview: Opsview is an IT monitoring and analytics platform that offers a combination of open-source and enterprise features. It provides centralized monitoring, automation capabilities, SLA reporting, and integrations with ITSM tools and cloud platforms. Pros: Hybrid model for flexibility. Cons: Limited community support compared to fully open-source solutions.
- Zenoss: Zenoss is a cloud-based monitoring platform that offers hybrid IT monitoring, analytics, and automated remediation capabilities. It provides real-time insights, infrastructure performance monitoring, event correlation, and predictive analytics. Pros: Comprehensive monitoring features with AI-driven insights. Cons: Can be complex to set up and configure.
- Pandora FMS: Pandora FMS is a flexible and scalable monitoring solution that offers advanced features for network, server, and application monitoring. It provides agentless monitoring, customizable dashboards, event management, and integrated reporting tools. Pros: Flexible licensing options and modular architecture. Cons: Steeper learning curve for customization.
- Checkmk: Checkmk is an open-source and flexible monitoring solution that provides comprehensive monitoring for networks, servers, applications, and cloud environments. It offers automation capabilities, performance graphs, configurable alerting, and integration with various IT tools. Pros: Versatile and scalable monitoring features. Cons: Initial setup can be complex for beginners.
- Pulseway: Pulseway is a remote monitoring and management solution that allows users to monitor and manage their IT infrastructure from anywhere. It offers real-time monitoring, remote desktop access, custom scripts execution, and mobile applications for on-the-go monitoring. Pros: Mobile-friendly interface and easy to set up. Cons: Limited customization options compared to other solutions.
Top Alternatives to Nagios XI
- Zabbix
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics. ...
- Icinga
It monitors availability and performance, gives you simple access to relevant data and raises alerts to keep you in the loop. It was originally created as a fork of the Nagios system monitoring application. ...
- Nagios
Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License. ...
- Solarwinds
Developed by network and systems engineers who know what it takes to manage today's dynamic IT environments, SolarWinds has a deep connection to the IT community. ...
- Datadog
Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog! ...
- PRTG
It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications. ...
- Dynatrace
It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before. ...
- New Relic
The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too. ...
Nagios XI alternatives & related posts
- Free21
- Alerts9
- Service/node/network discovery5
- Templates5
- Base metrics from the box4
- Multi-dashboards3
- SMS/Email/Messenger alerts3
- Grafana plugin available2
- Supports Graphs ans screens2
- Support proxies (for monitoring remote branches)2
- Perform website checking (response time, loading, ...)1
- API available for creating own apps1
- Templates free available (Zabbix Share)1
- Works with multiple databases1
- Advanced integrations1
- Supports multiple protocols/agents1
- Complete Logs Report1
- Open source1
- Supports large variety of Operating Systems1
- Supports JMX (Java, Tomcat, Jboss, ...)1
- The UI is in PHP5
- Puppet module is sluggish2
related Zabbix posts
My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!
I am looking for an easy to set up and use monitoring solution for my servers and network infrastructure. What are the main differences between Checkmk and Zabbix? What would you recommend and why?
related Icinga posts
One size definitely doesn’t fit all when it comes to open source monitoring solutions, and executing generally understood best practices in the context of unique distributed systems presents all sorts of problems. Megan Anctil, a senior engineer on the Technical Operations team at Slack gave a talk at an O’Reilly Velocity Conference sharing pain points and lessons learned at wrangling known technologies such as Icinga, Graphite, Grafana, and the Elastic Stack to best fit the company’s use cases.
At the time, Slack used a few well-known monitoring tools since it’s Technical Operations team wasn’t large enough to build an in-house solution for all of these. Nor did the team think it’s sustainable to throw money at the problem, given the volume of information processed and the not-insignificant price and rigidity of many vendor solutions. With thousands of servers across multiple regions and millions of metrics and documents being processed and indexed per second, the team had to figure out how to scale these technologies to fit Slack’s needs.
On the backend, they experimented with multiple clusters in both Graphite and ELK, distributed Icinga nodes, and more. At the same time, they’ve tried to build usability into Grafana that reflects the team’s mental models of the system and have found ways to make alerts from Icinga more insightful and actionable.
Nagios
- It just works53
- The standard28
- Customizable12
- The Most flexible monitoring system8
- Huge stack of free checks/plugins to choose from1
related Nagios posts
Why we spent several years building an open source, large-scale metrics alerting system, M3, built for Prometheus:
By late 2014, all services, infrastructure, and servers at Uber emitted metrics to a Graphite stack that stored them using the Whisper file format in a sharded Carbon cluster. We used Grafana for dashboarding and Nagios for alerting, issuing Graphite threshold checks via source-controlled scripts. While this worked for a while, expanding the Carbon cluster required a manual resharding process and, due to lack of replication, any single node’s disk failure caused permanent loss of its associated metrics. In short, this solution was not able to meet our needs as the company continued to grow.
To ensure the scalability of Uber’s metrics backend, we decided to build out a system that provided fault tolerant metrics ingestion, storage, and querying as a managed platform...
(GitHub : https://github.com/m3db/m3)
I am new to DevOps and looking for training in DevOps. Some institutes are offering Nagios while some Prometheus in their syllabus. Please suggest which one is being used in the industry and which one should I learn.
related Solarwinds posts
- Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)140
- Easy setup107
- Powerful ui87
- Powerful integrations84
- Great value70
- Great visualization54
- Events + metrics = clarity46
- Notifications41
- Custom metrics41
- Flexibility39
- Free & paid plans19
- Great customer support16
- Makes my life easier15
- Adapts automatically as i scale up10
- Easy setup and plugins9
- Super easy and powerful8
- In-context collaboration7
- AWS support7
- Rich in features6
- Docker support5
- Cute logo4
- Simple, powerful, great for infra4
- Monitor almost everything4
- Full visibility of applications4
- Easy to Analyze4
- Cost4
- Source control and bug tracking4
- Best than others4
- Automation tools4
- Best in the field3
- Expensive3
- Good for Startups3
- Free setup3
- APM2
- Expensive20
- No errors exception tracking4
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging2
- Complicated1
related Datadog posts
Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.
We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
- Poor search capabilities1
- Graphs are static1
- Running on windows1
related PRTG posts
- Real User Monitoring4
- Automated RCA4
- Out-of-the-box distributed transaction tracing3
- Built on massive industry expertise (since 2005)2
- AI-powered platform2
- Extensible via SDK2
- Digital Experience1
- Easy setup1
- Accelerate software delivery1
- Infrastructure Monitoring1
- Applications & Microservices1
- Application Security1
- Built on API-first design principles1
- Automatic instrumentathird generation full stack Agents1
- Analytics vMotion events detection Discovery Performanc1
- Automation1
- Business Analytics1
- Application Security0
- Real User Monitoring0
- Infrastructure Monitoring0
- Applications & Microservices0
- AI-powered platform0
related Dynatrace posts
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
Hi Folks,
I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?
New Relic
- Easy setup414
- Really powerful344
- Awesome visualization245
- Ease of use194
- Great ui151
- Free tier106
- Great tool for insights80
- Heroku Integration66
- Market leader55
- Peace of mind49
- Push notifications21
- Email notifications20
- Heroku Add-on17
- Error Detection and Alerting16
- Multiple language support13
- SQL Analysis11
- Server Resources Monitoring11
- Transaction Tracing9
- Apdex Scores8
- Azure Add-on8
- Analysis of CPU, Disk, Memory, and Network7
- Detailed reports7
- Performance of External Services6
- Error Analysis6
- Application Availability Monitoring and Alerting6
- Application Response Times6
- Most Time Consuming Transactions5
- JVM Performance Analyzer (Java)5
- Browser Transaction Tracing4
- Top Database Operations4
- Easy to use4
- Application Map3
- Weekly Performance Email3
- Pagoda Box integration3
- Custom Dashboards3
- Easy to setup2
- Background Jobs Transaction Analysis2
- App Speed Index2
- Super Expensive1
- Team Collaboration Tools1
- Metric Data Retention1
- Metric Data Resolution1
- Worst Transactions by User Dissatisfaction1
- Real User Monitoring Overview1
- Real User Monitoring Analysis and Breakdown1
- Time Comparisons1
- Access to Performance Data API1
- Incident Detection and Alerting1
- Best of the best, what more can you ask for1
- Best monitoring on the market1
- Rails integration1
- Free1
- Proce0
- Price0
- Exceptions0
- Cost0
- Pricing model doesn't suit microservices20
- UI isn't great10
- Expensive7
- Visualizations aren't very helpful7
- Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking5
related New Relic posts
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
I need to choose a monitoring tool for my project, but currently, my application doesn't have much load or many users. My application is not generating GBs of data. We don't want to send the user information to New Relic because it's a 3rd party tool. And we can deploy Kibana locally on our server. What should I use, Kibana or New Relic?