StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. NestJS vs Vert.x

NestJS vs Vert.x

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vert.x
Vert.x
Stacks259
Followers325
Votes59
NestJS
NestJS
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.0K
Votes326
GitHub Stars73.3K
Forks8.1K

NestJS vs Vert.x: What are the differences?

NestJS is a framework for building efficient, scalable, and maintainable server-side applications using Node.js. On the other hand, Vert.x is a toolkit for building reactive applications on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). Both frameworks offer similar features and functionality, but there are key differences between them.

  1. Language: NestJS is written in TypeScript, which is a statically-typed superset of JavaScript. It leverages the latest ECMAScript features and provides strong typing. In contrast, Vert.x is written in Java and supports other JVM languages like Groovy and Kotlin.

  2. Concurrency Model: NestJS follows an event-driven concurrency model with Node.js, utilizing non-blocking I/O operations. On the other hand, Vert.x is built on the principles of the reactive programming model, providing a consistent and unified API for handling asynchronous events.

  3. Scalability: NestJS supports horizontal scalability with the help of a load balancer or by deploying multiple instances of the application. It also offers multiple caching mechanisms and session management options. Vert.x, on the other hand, supports both vertical and horizontal scalability without the need for a load balancer.

  4. Integration with other frameworks: NestJS provides seamless integration with popular frameworks like Express.js, Fastify, and TypeORM. It also has excellent support for various databases, messaging systems, and other third-party libraries. Vert.x, on the other hand, offers integration with a wide range of technologies, including Spring, Apache Kafka, and JDBC.

  5. Development Philosophy: NestJS follows the opinionated approach, providing a ready-to-use structure and set of conventions that promote clean code architecture. It focuses on developer productivity and ease of use. Vert.x, on the other hand, follows a more modular approach, allowing developers to pick and choose the components they need. It promotes flexibility and customization.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: NestJS has gained popularity in the JavaScript and TypeScript community, with an active and growing ecosystem of libraries, plugins, and extensions. It has a strong community support and a dedicated team of developers. Vert.x also has a vibrant community and ecosystem, mainly in the Java ecosystem, with a focus on reactive programming.

In summary, NestJS is a TypeScript-based framework with an opinionated approach, providing strong typing and a ready-to-use structure. It focuses on developer productivity and ease of use. On the other hand, Vert.x is a toolkit for building reactive applications on the JVM, offering flexibility and customization options. It follows the principles of reactive programming and has a wide range of integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vert.x, NestJS

juan9222
juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

  • Login
  • Register
  • Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
  • Account Preferences.
  • Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k
Comments
Louai
Louai

Full Stack Web Developer

May 15, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsTypeScriptTypeScriptExpressJSExpressJS

I'm planning with a small team to create an application which is a platform for restaurants. I'm on the backend almost alone currently. I'm going to use Node.js for that, and I'm very fond of TypeScript, and I worked before mostly with ExpressJS. The team may get bigger as the application becomes bigger and more successful, so I have the Scalability concern in mind now, and I was considering these options:

  1. Use Node+Express+Typescript
  2. Use Node+NestJs (which utilizes Typescript by default)

Option 2 is enticing to me because recently I came to love NestJS and it provides more scalability for the project and uses Typescript in the best way and uses Express under the hood. Also I come from an Angular 2 background, which I think is the best frontend framework (my opinion, and I know React quite well), which makes Nest feel familiar to me because of the similarity between Nest and Angular. Option 1 on the other hand uses Express which is a minimalist framework, very popular one, but it doesn't provide the same scalability and brings decision fatigue about what to combine with it and may not utilize Typescript in the best way. Yet, on the other hand, it is flexible and it may be easier to manipulate things in different ways with it. Another very important thing is that it would be easier in my view to hire Node developers with skills in Express than NestJs. The majority of Node developers are much more familiar with JavaScript and Express.

What is your advice and why? I would love to hear especially from developers who worked on both Express and Nest

549k views549k
Comments
Slimane
Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNestJSNestJSNode.jsNode.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vert.x
Vert.x
NestJS
NestJS

It is event driven and non blocking application framework. This means your app can handle a lot of concurrency using a small number of kernel threads. It lets your app scale with minimal hardware.

Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.

polygot; Simple concurrency model
Extensible - Gives you true flexibility by allowing use of any other libraries thanks to modular architecture.; Versatile - An adaptable ecosystem that is a fully-fledged backbone for all kinds of server-side applications.; Progressive - Takes advantage of latest JavaScript features, bringing design patterns and mature solutions to node.js world.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
73.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.1K
Stacks
259
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
325
Followers
3.0K
Votes
59
Votes
326
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Light weight
  • 12
    Fast
  • 8
    Java
  • 6
    Developers Are Super
  • 5
    Extensible
Cons
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 2
    Too Many Conflicting Versions And Suggestions
Pros
  • 54
    Powerful but super friendly to work with
  • 42
    Fast development
  • 40
    Easy to understand documentation
  • 36
    Angular style syntax for the backend
  • 32
    NodeJS ecosystem
Cons
  • 10
    User base is small. Less help on Stackoverflow
  • 10
    Difficult to debug
  • 5
    Angular-like architecture
  • 3
    Updates with breaking changes
  • 3
    Javascript
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
Kotlin
Kotlin
Groovy
Groovy
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Vert.x, NestJS?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase