StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Nette vs Symfony

Nette vs Symfony

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Symfony
Symfony
Stacks8.5K
Followers6.2K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars30.7K
Forks9.7K
Nette
Nette
Stacks45
Followers38
Votes1
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks230

Nette vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Introduction

Nette and Symfony are two popular PHP frameworks. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between them that distinguish their features and usage.

  1. Project Size and Complexity: Nette is known for being lightweight and suitable for small to medium-sized projects. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it a good choice for beginners or projects with limited requirements. On the other hand, Symfony is a more robust framework suitable for large-scale, enterprise-level projects. It provides a wide range of components and functionalities, including advanced features like cache management, form handling, and authentication.

  2. Flexibility and Modularity: Nette follows a modular, standalone approach, where you can choose which components to include in your project, offering high flexibility and modularity. This allows developers to keep the projects lightweight and tailor them to their specific needs. In contrast, Symfony follows a bundle-based architecture, where functionalities are grouped into reusable bundles. While this provides a more integrated and structured development experience, it may require including more components than needed, potentially increasing the project size.

  3. Documentation and Community Support: Symfony has a larger and more established community, resulting in a vast amount of high-quality documentation, tutorials, and third-party libraries available. It also has well-defined coding standards and a reliable support system. In comparison, the Nette community is smaller, and although the framework has good documentation, it may require more searches for specific topics or rely on community help.

  4. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Nette is often praised for its simplicity and intuitive design, making it easier for beginners to grasp and start building projects quickly. It has a shallow learning curve and avoids unnecessary complexity. Symfony, on the other hand, is more complex due to its extensive feature set and the learning curve can be steeper, making it better suited for experienced developers.

  5. Performance: Nette is designed to be lightweight and efficient, resulting in better performance for smaller scale projects. It has a minimalistic approach and avoids unnecessary overhead. Symfony, on the other hand, provides more advanced features and tools, which can lead to increased memory usage and slightly slower performance, especially in comparison to Nette for smaller projects.

  6. Maturity and Long-term Support: Symfony has been around for a longer time and is considered a mature, stable framework with a strong long-term support commitment. It follows a strict release cycle and tackles security vulnerabilities promptly. Nette is also stable but may not have the same level of long-term support and industry recognition as Symfony.

In summary, Nette and Symfony differ in terms of project size and complexity, flexibility and modularity, documentation and community support, learning curve and ease of use, performance, as well as maturity and long-term support commitment. Selecting the appropriate framework depends on the project requirements, scalability, and the development team's experience level.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Symfony, Nette

Fabian
Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGraphQLGraphQLC++C++SymfonySymfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony
Symfony
Nette
Nette

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Lets you focus on the creative part of being a developer. It's built to be extremely usable, friendly and a joy to use. Its comprehensible yet efficient syntax, a cutting edge debugger and industry-leading security features let you write e-commerce sites, wikis, blogs, CMS or anything you can imagine faster and better than ever.

-
Excellent template system;Unbeatable diagnostic tools;Extraordinarily effective database layer;Rock-solid protection against known vulnerabilities;HTML5 and AJAX support;SEO friendly;Well written documentation and an active open source community;Mature and clean object oriented design leveraging the latest PHP features;Best-practice solutions that are encouraged, but not enforced
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.7K
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Forks
9.7K
GitHub Forks
230
Stacks
8.5K
Stacks
45
Followers
6.2K
Followers
38
Votes
1.1K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Open source
  • 149
    Php
  • 130
    Community
  • 129
    Dependency injection
  • 122
    Professional
Cons
  • 10
    Too many dependency
  • 8
    Lot of config files
  • 4
    YMAL
  • 3
    Feature creep
  • 1
    Bloated
Pros
  • 1
    Small size
Integrations
CakePHP
CakePHP
PHP
PHP
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
Oracle
Oracle
PHP
PHP
GitHub
GitHub
Robot Framework
Robot Framework

What are some alternatives to Symfony, Nette?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase