StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Localhost Tools
  5. PageKite vs ngrok

PageKite vs ngrok

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PageKite
PageKite
Stacks13
Followers77
Votes3
GitHub Stars748
Forks122
ngrok
ngrok
Stacks419
Followers457
Votes57
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks4.3K

PageKite vs ngrok: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here>

  1. Security: One key difference between PageKite and ngrok is in terms of security. PageKite provides built-in transport encryption with HTTPS, ensuring secure communication between the user's website and the internet. On the other hand, ngrok does not provide transport encryption by default, potentially leaving the user's data vulnerable to interception or unauthorized access unless additional measures are taken.

  2. Custom Domains: Another significant difference is the support for custom domains. PageKite allows users to easily associate their website with a personalized domain name, providing a more professional and branded online presence. In contrast, ngrok does not have native support for custom domains, limiting users to the default ngrok.io subdomains.

  3. Session Persistence: PageKite offers session persistence, which means that a user's session will remain connected even when their IP address changes or they switch networks. This is particularly useful for scenarios where uninterrupted access to a live website is required, such as during demos or testing. On the other hand, ngrok does not offer session persistence, and a new session would need to be established whenever the IP address changes.

  4. Authentication and Access Control: PageKite provides built-in authentication and access control mechanisms, allowing users to restrict access to their website based on valid credentials. This helps prevent unauthorized users from accessing the website or its resources. In contrast, ngrok does not offer native authentication and access control features, potentially exposing the website to unauthorized access unless additional measures are implemented.

  5. Scalability and Load Balancing: PageKite offers scalability and load balancing options, allowing users to distribute incoming traffic across multiple backend servers. This helps handle high traffic loads and ensures optimal performance of the website. In contrast, ngrok does not provide built-in scalability and load balancing capabilities, and users would need to rely on external load balancing solutions if required.

  6. Pricing Options: PageKite and ngrok differ in their pricing models. PageKite offers both free and paid plans, providing users with flexibility based on their needs and budget. The free plan includes limited features and usage, while the paid plans offer additional benefits and increased usage allowances. On the other hand, ngrok follows a “freemium” model, where basic usage is free, but users are required to subscribe to a paid plan for advanced features and increased usage limits.

In Summary, PageKite and ngrok differ in terms of security, support for custom domains, session persistence, authentication and access control, scalability and load balancing, as well as pricing options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PageKite
PageKite
ngrok
ngrok

PageKite is a system for exposing localhost servers to the public Internet. It is most commonly used to make local web servers or SSH servers publicly visible, although almost any TCP-based protocol can work if the client knows how to use an HTTP proxy.

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

Let colleagues and clients test or remote-debug directly off your computer.;Simplify testing on mobile devices and live networks.;Run webhooks, API servers or git repos on your desktop - or in a VM.;Develop Facebook apps using our wild-card SSL certificate.;Work from anywhere, even over 3G or limited WiFi.;Secure your work with HTTP auth. and SSL encryption.
Expose any http service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a subdomain of ngrok.com;Expose any tcp service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a random port of ngrok.com;Inspect all http requests/responses that are transmitted over the tunnel;Replay any request that was transmitted over the tunnel
Statistics
GitHub Stars
748
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Forks
122
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
13
Stacks
419
Followers
77
Followers
457
Votes
3
Votes
57
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Premium is half price of ngrok
  • 1
    Dedicated URL
Pros
  • 26
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Super-fast
  • 7
    Free
  • 6
    Awesome traffic analysis page
  • 5
    Reliable custom domains
Cons
  • 5
    Doesn't Support UDP
  • 1
    El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente
Integrations
No integrations available
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to PageKite, ngrok?

Termius

Termius

The #1 cross-platform terminal with built-in ssh client which works as your own portable server management system in any situation.

GoTTY

GoTTY

GoTTY is a simple command line tool that turns your CLI tools into web applications.

MAMP

MAMP

It can be installed under macOS and Windows with just a few clicks. It provides them with all the tools they need to run WordPress on their desktop PC for testing or development purposes, for example. It doesn't matter if you prefer Apache or Nginx or if you want to work with PHP, Python, Perl or Ruby.

warp

warp

warp lets you securely share your terminal with one simple command: warp open. When connected to your warp, clients can see your terminal exactly as if they were sitting next to you. You can also grant them write access, the equivalent of handing them your keyboard.

Warp

Warp

It is a blazingly fast, Rust-based terminal that makes you and your team more productive at running, debugging, and deploying code and infrastructure. It is a fully-native app built in Rust that renders on the GPU. Our mission is to elevate developer productivity.

Expose

Expose

It is a beautiful, open-source, tunnel application that allows you to share your local websites with others via the internet. Since you can host the server yourself, you have full control over the domains that your shared sites will be available at.

Requestly

Requestly

Requestly is a lightweight proxy available as a browser extension & desktop app to intercept & modify network requests. Using Requestly you can Modify Headers, Redirect URL, Mock API response, Delay/Throttle requests, etc.

DevUtils

DevUtils

It helps you with your tiny daily tasks with just a single click! It's totally open source and work offline.

Mr.2

Mr.2

Helps you expose a local server to an external network. Supports both TCP/UDP, of course, support HTTP.

Teleconsole

Teleconsole

Teleconsole is a free service to share your terminal session with people you trust. Your friends can join via a command line using SSH or by using their browser. Use it when two parties are separated by NAT and you cannot connect via SSH directly.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana