StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. NodeGUI vs Ultralight

NodeGUI vs Ultralight

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ultralight
Ultralight
Stacks2
Followers31
Votes2
GitHub Stars4.9K
Forks202
NodeGUI
NodeGUI
Stacks15
Followers109
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks308

NodeGUI vs Ultralight: What are the differences?

  1. Rendering Technology: NodeGUI uses Qt for rendering while Ultralight utilizes WebKit technology for rendering web content.
  2. Platform Compatibility: NodeGUI can be used to create native desktop applications across all major desktop operating systems, whereas Ultralight is primarily designed for embedded systems and console applications.
  3. JavaScript Engine: NodeGUI leverages Node.js and V8 JavaScript engine for executing JavaScript code within the application, while Ultralight has its JS engine specifically optimized for lightweight web applications.
  4. Resource Consumption: NodeGUI tends to consume more system resources due to its reliance on Qt for rendering, whereas Ultralight is designed to be lightweight and efficient in resource usage.
  5. Community Support: NodeGUI has a larger and more active community for support and collaboration compared to Ultralight, which has a smaller community due to its niche focus on embedded systems.
  6. Application Performance: NodeGUI applications may have better overall performance and responsiveness due to the mature rendering capabilities of Qt, while Ultralight may offer faster load times for web content rendering.

In Summary, NodeGUI and Ultralight differ in rendering technology, platform compatibility, JavaScript engine, resource consumption, community support, and application performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ultralight
Ultralight
NodeGUI
NodeGUI

intended to be used for rendering HTML UI within games and desktop apps. The API is currently available for C++ and supports OpenGL 3.2+, Direct3D 11, and Metal 2.

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

-
Cross platform;Low CPU and memory footprint;Styling with CSS ;Complete Nodejs api support ;Good Devtools support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.9K
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
202
GitHub Forks
308
Stacks
2
Stacks
15
Followers
31
Followers
109
Votes
2
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Ligero, rápido estilo propio sin lastre nativo
  • 1
    De código abierto
Pros
  • 1
    Its not hybrid & fully native.
  • 1
    Easy to make cross platform & resource efficient apps
  • 1
    Rich API which binds C++ QT
  • 1
    No webkit thus super resource efficient
  • 1
    It uses Qode which is a fork of Node to be used with QT
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have x86 support
Integrations
C++
C++
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
Windows
Windows
CSS 3
CSS 3
macOS
macOS
Qt
Qt

What are some alternatives to Ultralight, NodeGUI?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase