StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. OCaml vs Swift

OCaml vs Swift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swift
Swift
Stacks21.9K
Followers13.6K
Votes1.3K
OCaml
OCaml
Stacks321
Followers186
Votes28

OCaml vs Swift: What are the differences?

Key Differences between OCaml and Swift

OCaml and Swift are two different programming languages with different features and purposes. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Type Inference: OCaml is a statically typed language with strong type inference capabilities. It can automatically infer the type of variables based on their usage. On the other hand, Swift also supports type inference, but it is a statically and strongly typed language that requires explicit type annotations in some cases.

  2. Functional Programming Paradigm: OCaml is primarily a functional programming language that supports features like pattern matching, higher-order functions, and immutable data structures. In contrast, Swift is a multi-paradigm language that supports both functional and imperative programming styles. It allows mutating state, imperative control flow, and object-oriented programming.

  3. Memory Management: OCaml uses automatic memory management through a technique called garbage collection. It frees the programmer from worrying about memory allocation and deallocation. In contrast, Swift uses Automatic Reference Counting (ARC), where memory deallocation is handled by keeping track of references to objects. It does not have a garbage collector.

  4. Concurrency Model: OCaml provides lightweight threads (also known as cooperative multitasking) and supports locking and synchronization mechanisms for concurrent programming. Swift, on the other hand, supports both lightweight threads and a more fine-grained approach to concurrency using async/await, actors, and structured concurrency.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: OCaml has a well-established compiler and tooling infrastructure, with powerful libraries and frameworks for various domains. It is widely used in academia and industry, particularly in the functional programming community. Swift, on the other hand, has been developed by Apple and has excellent tooling support, focused mainly on iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS app development.

  6. Platform Compatibility: OCaml is a cross-platform programming language that can be compiled to various architectures and operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows. Swift, initially designed for Apple's platforms, is primarily used for developing applications targeting iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS, although there are efforts to bring it to other platforms as well.

In summary, OCaml is a statically and strongly typed functional programming language with automatic memory management and excellent tooling support, while Swift is a multi-paradigm language with type inference, automatic reference counting, support for concurrency, and a focus on Apple's platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Swift
Swift
OCaml
OCaml

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

It is an industrial strength programming language supporting functional, imperative and object-oriented styles. It is the technology of choice in companies where a single mistake can cost millions and speed matters,

-
functional style; imperative style; object-oriented style
Statistics
Stacks
21.9K
Stacks
321
Followers
13.6K
Followers
186
Votes
1.3K
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 259
    Ios
  • 180
    Elegant
  • 126
    Not Objective-C
  • 107
    Backed by apple
  • 93
    Type inference
Cons
  • 6
    Must own a mac
  • 2
    Memory leaks are not uncommon
  • 1
    Complicated process for exporting modules
  • 1
    Its classes compile to roughly 300 lines of assembly
  • 1
    Is a lot more effort than lua to make simple functions
Pros
  • 7
    Satisfying to write
  • 6
    Pattern matching
  • 4
    Also has OOP
  • 4
    Very practical
  • 3
    Extremely powerful type inference
Cons
  • 3
    Small community
  • 1
    Royal pain in the neck to compile large programs
Integrations
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Swift, OCaml?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase