StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Openstack Swift vs Portworx

Openstack Swift vs Portworx

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift
Stacks33
Followers91
Votes0
Portworx
Portworx
Stacks21
Followers58
Votes0
GitHub Stars271
Forks84

Portworx vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Developers describe Portworx as "Manage any database or stateful service on any infrastructure using any container scheduler". It is the cloud native storage company that enterprises depend on to reduce the cost and complexity of rapidly deploying containerized applications across multiple clouds and on-prem environments. On the other hand, Openstack Swift is detailed as "A distributed object storage system designed to scale from a single machine to thousands of servers". It is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent object/blob store. Organizations can use Swift to store lots of data efficiently.

Portworx and Openstack Swift are primarily classified as "Container" and "Cloud Storage" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Portworx are:

  • Data Mobility
  • Backup, recovery, migration made easy
  • High Availability

On the other hand, Openstack Swift provides the following key features:

  • Distributed
  • consistent
  • Object/blob store

Portworx is an open source tool with 201 GitHub stars and 34 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Portworx's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift
Portworx
Portworx

It is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent object/blob store. Organizations can use Swift to store lots of data efficiently.

It is the cloud native storage company that enterprises depend on to reduce the cost and complexity of rapidly deploying containerized applications across multiple clouds and on-prem environments.

Distributed; consistent; Object/blob store
Data Mobility; Backup, recovery, migration made easy; High Availability; Scheduler-based Automation; Data Security; Anything, Anywhere.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
271
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
84
Stacks
33
Stacks
21
Followers
91
Followers
58
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Nomad
Nomad
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
IBM DB2
IBM DB2

What are some alternatives to Openstack Swift, Portworx?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase