Overview

Phalcon

Stacks246

Followers294

Votes354

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks2.0K

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Phalcon vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This markdown provides key differences between Phalcon and Spring-Boot for easy reference.

1. **Programming Language**: Phalcon is written in C and offers better performance due to its low-level architecture, while Spring Boot is built on Java, making it more accessible to Java developers.
  
2. **Framework Maturity**: Phalcon is a relatively newer framework compared to Spring Boot, which has been around for a longer period, leading to a more robust and stable ecosystem with extensive community support and resources.

3. **ORM Support**: Spring Boot has excellent support for Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tools like Hibernate, JPA, and Spring Data JPA, while Phalcon lacks comprehensive ORM solutions, requiring developers to rely on third-party libraries.

4. **Configuration**: Phalcon emphasizes configuration through code with minimal reliance on external configuration files, offering more control and flexibility, whereas Spring Boot promotes convention over configuration, simplifying setup but potentially limiting customization options.

5. **Dependency Injection**: Spring Boot relies heavily on the Spring Framework's Dependency Injection feature, enabling easier management of dependencies and facilitating testability, while Phalcon offers manual Dependency Injection, requiring developers to manage dependencies themselves.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Spring Boot has a larger and more active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available, making it easier to find support and resources compared to the smaller Phalcon community.

In Summary, Phalcon and Spring Boot differ in programming language, framework maturity, ORM support, configuration approach, dependency injection, and community/ecosystem size.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Advice on Phalcon, Spring Boot

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Anonymous

Sep 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Kotlin

Django

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

617k views617k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon	Spring Boot
Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.	Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.8K	GitHub Stars 78.9K
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks 41.6K
Stacks 246	Stacks 26.7K
Followers 294	Followers 24.3K
Votes 354	Votes 1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros 65 Fast 54 High performance 37 Open source 35 Fast and easy to use 32 Scalable Cons 4 Support few databases 2 Very bad documentation	Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive
Integrations
PHP	Spring Java

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, Spring Boot?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.