Alternatives to Photon logo

Alternatives to Photon

Electron, Atom, Wave, JavaScript, and Python are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Photon.
30
89
+ 1
0

What is Photon and what are its top alternatives?

Photon is a lightweight and high-performance open-source Web browser engine developed by Mozilla. It is designed to render web pages quickly and efficiently, providing a smooth and fluid user experience. Photon features a modern architecture that takes advantage of multiple cores and GPUs for improved performance. However, Photon has limitations in terms of its support for cutting-edge web technologies and compatibility with certain web standards.

  1. Blink: Blink is the web browser engine used by Google Chrome. It is known for its speed, stability, and compatibility with modern web standards. Pros include strong integration with Google services and frequent updates, while cons include some privacy concerns due to Google's data collection practices.

  2. WebKit: WebKit is an open-source web browser engine used in Apple's Safari browser. It is known for its fast rendering speed and efficient memory usage. Pros include tight integration with Apple products and excellent support for web standards, while cons include occasional compatibility issues with certain websites.

  3. Gecko: Gecko is the web browser engine developed by Mozilla used in Firefox. It is known for its security features, customization options, and strong privacy controls. Pros include robust support for web standards and a large library of extensions, while cons include occasional performance issues on certain websites.

  4. Trident: Trident is the web browser engine developed by Microsoft used in Internet Explorer. It is known for its backwards compatibility with older web technologies. Pros include compatibility with legacy websites and strong integration with Microsoft products, while cons include security vulnerabilities and outdated features.

  5. Servo: Servo is an experimental web browser engine developed by Mozilla, with a focus on parallel processing and a more secure architecture. Pros include improved performance and security features, while cons include limited support for certain web standards and compatibility with existing websites.

  6. Quantum: Quantum is a project by Mozilla to improve the performance and efficiency of Firefox using a combination of technologies, including the Servo engine. Pros include faster page loading and enhanced security features, while cons include compatibility issues with certain websites and extensions.

  7. Chromium: Chromium is an open-source browser project that serves as the foundation for Google Chrome. Pros include a clean and minimalist interface, frequent updates, and a large library of extensions, while cons include some privacy concerns and occasional stability issues.

  8. EdgeHTML: EdgeHTML is the web browser engine developed by Microsoft used in the Edge browser. It is known for its speed, efficiency, and compatibility with modern web standards. Pros include integration with Windows features and security enhancements, while cons include occasional compatibility issues with certain websites.

  9. KDE's KHTML: KHTML is an open-source web browser engine used in the Konqueror browser. It is known for its lightweight and efficient performance. Pros include tight integration with the KDE desktop environment, while cons include limited features and compatibility compared to more mainstream engines.

  10. Brower.js: Browser.js is a JavaScript library that emulates a web browser environment for testing and development purposes. It allows developers to test their websites in a controlled environment. Pros include flexibility and customization options, while cons include limited functionality compared to full-fledged browser engines.

Top Alternatives to Photon

  • Electron
    Electron

    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor. ...

  • Atom
    Atom

    At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it. ...

  • Wave
    Wave

    It is a free, online software alternative to Quickbooks. Wave helps manage invoices, credit card payments, accounting & payroll. Best for small businesses & freelancers. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

  • PHP
    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

Photon alternatives & related posts

Electron logo

Electron

11.5K
148
Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
11.5K
148
PROS OF ELECTRON
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
CONS OF ELECTRON
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection

related Electron posts

Paul Whittemore
Developer and Owner at Appurist Software · | 15 upvotes · 1.1M views

I'm building most projects using: Server: either Fastify (all projects going forward) or ExpressJS on Node.js (existing, previously) on the server side, and Client app: either Vuetify (currently) or Quasar Framework (going forward) on Vue.js with vuex on Electron for the UI to deliver both web-based and desktop applications for multiple platforms.

The direct support for Android and iOS in Quasar Framework will make it my go-to client UI platform for any new client-side or web work. On the server, I'll probably use Fastly for all my server work, unless I get into Go more in the future.

Update: The mobile support in Quasar is not a sufficiently compelling reason to move me from Vuetify. I have decided to stick with Vuetify for a UI for Vue, as it is richer in components and enables a really great-looking professional result. For mobile platforms, I will just use Cordova to wrap the Vue+Vuetify app for mobile, and Electron to wrap it for desktop platforms.

See more

Vue.js vuex Vue Router Quasar Framework Electron Node.js npm Yarn Git GitHub Netlify My tech stack that helps me develop quickly and efficiently. Wouldn't want it any other way.

See more
Atom logo

Atom

17K
2.5K
A hackable text editor for the 21st Century
17K
2.5K
PROS OF ATOM
  • 529
    Free
  • 449
    Open source
  • 343
    Modular design
  • 321
    Hackable
  • 316
    Beautiful UI
  • 147
    Backed by github
  • 119
    Built with node.js
  • 113
    Web native
  • 107
    Community
  • 35
    Packages
  • 18
    Cross platform
  • 5
    Nice UI
  • 5
    Multicursor support
  • 5
    TypeScript editor
  • 3
    Open source, lots of packages, and so configurable
  • 3
    cli start
  • 3
    Simple but powerful
  • 3
    Chrome Inspector works IN EDITOR
  • 3
    Snippets
  • 2
    Code readability
  • 2
    It's powerful
  • 2
    Awesome
  • 2
    Smart TypeScript code completion
  • 2
    Well documented
  • 1
    works with GitLab
  • 1
    "Free", "Hackable", "Open Source", The Awesomness
  • 1
    full support
  • 1
    vim support
  • 1
    Split-Tab Layout
  • 1
    Apm publish minor
  • 1
    Consistent UI on all platforms
  • 1
    User friendly
  • 1
    Hackable and Open Source
  • 0
    Publish
CONS OF ATOM
  • 19
    Slow with large files
  • 7
    Slow startup
  • 2
    Most of the time packages are hard to find.
  • 1
    No longer maintained
  • 1
    Cannot Run code with F5
  • 1
    Can be easily Modified

related Atom posts

Jerome Dalbert
Principal Backend Software Engineer at StackShare · | 13 upvotes · 945K views

I liked Sublime Text for its speed, simplicity and keyboard shortcuts which synergize well when working on scripting languages like Ruby and JavaScript. I extended the editor with custom Python scripts that improved keyboard navigability such as autofocusing the sidebar when no files are open, or changing tab closing behavior.

But customization can only get you so far, and there were little things that I still had to use the mouse for, such as scrolling, repositioning lines on the screen, selecting the line number of a failing test stack trace from a separate plugin pane, etc. After 3 years of wearily moving my arm and hand to perform the same repetitive tasks, I decided to switch to Vim for 3 reasons:

  • your fingers literally don’t ever need to leave the keyboard home row (I had to remap the escape key though)
  • it is a reliable tool that has been around for more than 30 years and will still be around for the next 30 years
  • I wanted to "look like a hacker" by doing everything inside my terminal and by becoming a better Unix citizen

The learning curve is very steep and it took me a year to master it, but investing time to be truly comfortable with my #TextEditor was more than worth it. To me, Vim comes close to being the perfect editor and I probably won’t need to switch ever again. It feels good to ignore new editors that come out every few years, like Atom and Visual Studio Code.

See more
Julian Sanchez
Lead Developer at Chore Champion · | 9 upvotes · 793.8K views

We use Visual Studio Code because it allows us to easily and quickly integrate with Git, much like Sublime Merge ,but it is integrated into the IDE. Another cool part about VS Code is the ability collaborate with each other with Visual Studio Live Share which allows our whole team to get more done together. It brings the convenience of the Google Suite to programming, offering something that works more smoothly than anything found on Atom or Sublime Text

See more
Wave logo

Wave

67
2
Free invoicing & accounting software with credit card processing & payroll services
67
2
PROS OF WAVE
  • 2
    1 free instance without CC forever?
CONS OF WAVE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Wave posts

    JavaScript logo

    JavaScript

    371.4K
    8.1K
    Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
    371.4K
    8.1K
    PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 1.7K
      Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 1.5K
      It's everywhere
    • 1.2K
      Lots of great frameworks
    • 899
      Fast
    • 746
      Light weight
    • 425
      Flexible
    • 392
      You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
    • 286
      Non-blocking i/o
    • 237
      Ubiquitousness
    • 191
      Expressive
    • 55
      Extended functionality to web pages
    • 49
      Relatively easy language
    • 46
      Executed on the client side
    • 30
      Relatively fast to the end user
    • 25
      Pure Javascript
    • 21
      Functional programming
    • 15
      Async
    • 13
      Full-stack
    • 12
      Its everywhere
    • 12
      Future Language of The Web
    • 12
      Setup is easy
    • 11
      JavaScript is the New PHP
    • 11
      Because I love functions
    • 10
      Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
    • 9
      Everyone use it
    • 9
      Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
    • 9
      Easy
    • 9
      Expansive community
    • 8
      For the good parts
    • 8
      Easy to hire developers
    • 8
      No need to use PHP
    • 8
      Most Popular Language in the World
    • 8
      Powerful
    • 8
      Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
    • 7
      It's fun
    • 7
      Its fun and fast
    • 7
      Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
    • 7
      Agile, packages simple to use
    • 7
      Supports lambdas and closures
    • 7
      Love-hate relationship
    • 7
      Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
    • 7
      Evolution of C
    • 7
      Hard not to use
    • 7
      Versitile
    • 7
      Nice
    • 6
      Easy to make something
    • 6
      Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
    • 6
      1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 6
      Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
    • 6
      It let's me use Babel & Typescript
    • 5
      Clojurescript
    • 5
      Everywhere
    • 5
      Scope manipulation
    • 5
      Function expressions are useful for callbacks
    • 5
      Stockholm Syndrome
    • 5
      Promise relationship
    • 5
      Client processing
    • 5
      What to add
    • 4
      Because it is so simple and lightweight
    • 4
      Only Programming language on browser
    • 1
      Subskill #4
    • 1
      Test2
    • 1
      Easy to understand
    • 1
      Not the best
    • 1
      Easy to learn
    • 1
      Hard to learn
    • 1
      Easy to learn and test
    • 1
      Love it
    • 1
      Test
    • 0
      Hard 彤
    CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 22
      A constant moving target, too much churn
    • 20
      Horribly inconsistent
    • 15
      Javascript is the New PHP
    • 9
      No ability to monitor memory utilitization
    • 8
      Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
    • 7
      Thinks strange results are better than errors
    • 6
      Can be ugly
    • 3
      No GitHub
    • 2
      Slow
    • 0
      HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

    related JavaScript posts

    Zach Holman

    Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

    But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

    But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

    Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Python logo

    Python

    250.4K
    6.9K
    A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
    250.4K
    6.9K
    PROS OF PYTHON
    • 1.2K
      Great libraries
    • 965
      Readable code
    • 848
      Beautiful code
    • 789
      Rapid development
    • 692
      Large community
    • 439
      Open source
    • 394
      Elegant
    • 283
      Great community
    • 274
      Object oriented
    • 222
      Dynamic typing
    • 78
      Great standard library
    • 62
      Very fast
    • 56
      Functional programming
    • 52
      Easy to learn
    • 47
      Scientific computing
    • 36
      Great documentation
    • 30
      Productivity
    • 29
      Matlab alternative
    • 29
      Easy to read
    • 25
      Simple is better than complex
    • 21
      It's the way I think
    • 20
      Imperative
    • 19
      Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
    • 19
      Free
    • 17
      Powerfull language
    • 17
      Machine learning support
    • 16
      Fast and simple
    • 14
      Scripting
    • 12
      Explicit is better than implicit
    • 11
      Ease of development
    • 10
      Clear and easy and powerfull
    • 9
      Unlimited power
    • 8
      It's lean and fun to code
    • 8
      Import antigravity
    • 7
      Print "life is short, use python"
    • 7
      Python has great libraries for data processing
    • 6
      Although practicality beats purity
    • 6
      Fast coding and good for competitions
    • 6
      There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
    • 6
      High Documented language
    • 6
      Readability counts
    • 6
      Rapid Prototyping
    • 6
      I love snakes
    • 6
      Now is better than never
    • 6
      Flat is better than nested
    • 6
      Great for tooling
    • 5
      Great for analytics
    • 5
      Web scraping
    • 5
      Lists, tuples, dictionaries
    • 4
      Complex is better than complicated
    • 4
      Socially engaged community
    • 4
      Plotting
    • 4
      Beautiful is better than ugly
    • 4
      Easy to learn and use
    • 4
      Easy to setup and run smooth
    • 4
      Simple and easy to learn
    • 4
      Multiple Inheritence
    • 4
      CG industry needs
    • 3
      List comprehensions
    • 3
      Powerful language for AI
    • 3
      Flexible and easy
    • 3
      It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
    • 3
      Many types of collections
    • 3
      If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
    • 3
      If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
    • 3
      Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
    • 3
      Pip install everything
    • 3
      No cruft
    • 3
      Generators
    • 3
      Import this
    • 2
      Can understand easily who are new to programming
    • 2
      Securit
    • 2
      Should START with this but not STICK with This
    • 2
      A-to-Z
    • 2
      Because of Netflix
    • 2
      Only one way to do it
    • 2
      Better outcome
    • 2
      Good for hacking
    • 2
      Batteries included
    • 2
      Procedural programming
    • 1
      Sexy af
    • 1
      Automation friendly
    • 1
      Slow
    • 1
      Best friend for NLP
    • 0
      Powerful
    • 0
      Keep it simple
    • 0
      Ni
    CONS OF PYTHON
    • 53
      Still divided between python 2 and python 3
    • 28
      Performance impact
    • 26
      Poor syntax for anonymous functions
    • 22
      GIL
    • 19
      Package management is a mess
    • 14
      Too imperative-oriented
    • 12
      Hard to understand
    • 12
      Dynamic typing
    • 12
      Very slow
    • 8
      Indentations matter a lot
    • 8
      Not everything is expression
    • 7
      Incredibly slow
    • 7
      Explicit self parameter in methods
    • 6
      Requires C functions for dynamic modules
    • 6
      Poor DSL capabilities
    • 6
      No anonymous functions
    • 5
      Fake object-oriented programming
    • 5
      Threading
    • 5
      The "lisp style" whitespaces
    • 5
      Official documentation is unclear.
    • 5
      Hard to obfuscate
    • 5
      Circular import
    • 4
      Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
    • 4
      The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
    • 4
      Not suitable for autocomplete
    • 2
      Meta classes
    • 1
      Training wheels (forced indentation)

    related Python posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

    Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

    It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

    I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

    What do you think about TensorFlow?

    Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

    See more
    Node.js logo

    Node.js

    193K
    8.5K
    A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
    193K
    8.5K
    PROS OF NODE.JS
    • 1.4K
      Npm
    • 1.3K
      Javascript
    • 1.1K
      Great libraries
    • 1K
      High-performance
    • 805
      Open source
    • 487
      Great for apis
    • 477
      Asynchronous
    • 425
      Great community
    • 390
      Great for realtime apps
    • 296
      Great for command line utilities
    • 86
      Websockets
    • 84
      Node Modules
    • 69
      Uber Simple
    • 59
      Great modularity
    • 58
      Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
    • 42
      Easy to start
    • 35
      Great for Data Streaming
    • 32
      Realtime
    • 28
      Awesome
    • 25
      Non blocking IO
    • 18
      Can be used as a proxy
    • 17
      High performance, open source, scalable
    • 16
      Non-blocking and modular
    • 15
      Easy and Fun
    • 14
      Easy and powerful
    • 13
      Future of BackEnd
    • 13
      Same lang as AngularJS
    • 12
      Fullstack
    • 11
      Fast
    • 10
      Scalability
    • 10
      Cross platform
    • 9
      Simple
    • 8
      Mean Stack
    • 7
      Great for webapps
    • 7
      Easy concurrency
    • 6
      Typescript
    • 6
      Fast, simple code and async
    • 6
      React
    • 6
      Friendly
    • 5
      Control everything
    • 5
      Its amazingly fast and scalable
    • 5
      Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
    • 5
      Scalable
    • 5
      Great speed
    • 5
      Fast development
    • 4
      It's fast
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 4
      Isomorphic coolness
    • 3
      Great community
    • 3
      Not Python
    • 3
      Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
    • 3
      TypeScript Support
    • 3
      Blazing fast
    • 3
      Performant and fast prototyping
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    • 3
      Easy
    • 3
      Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
    • 3
      One language, end-to-end
    • 3
      Less boilerplate code
    • 2
      Npm i ape-updating
    • 2
      Event Driven
    • 2
      Lovely
    • 1
      Creat for apis
    • 0
      Node
    CONS OF NODE.JS
    • 46
      Bound to a single CPU
    • 45
      New framework every day
    • 40
      Lots of terrible examples on the internet
    • 33
      Asynchronous programming is the worst
    • 24
      Callback
    • 19
      Javascript
    • 11
      Dependency hell
    • 11
      Dependency based on GitHub
    • 10
      Low computational power
    • 7
      Very very Slow
    • 7
      Can block whole server easily
    • 7
      Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
    • 4
      Breaking updates
    • 4
      Unstable
    • 3
      Unneeded over complication
    • 3
      No standard approach
    • 1
      Bad transitive dependency management
    • 1
      Can't read server session

    related Node.js posts

    Anurag Maurya

    Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

    Hello community,

    I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

    I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

    Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

    I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

    For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

    1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

    2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

    3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

    See more
    HTML5 logo

    HTML5

    153.3K
    2.2K
    5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
    153.3K
    2.2K
    PROS OF HTML5
    • 448
      New doctype
    • 389
      Local storage
    • 334
      Canvas
    • 285
      Semantic header and footer
    • 240
      Video element
    • 121
      Geolocation
    • 106
      Form autofocus
    • 100
      Email inputs
    • 85
      Editable content
    • 79
      Application caches
    • 10
      Easy to use
    • 9
      Cleaner Code
    • 5
      Easy
    • 4
      Websockets
    • 4
      Semantical
    • 3
      Audio element
    • 3
      Content focused
    • 3
      Better
    • 3
      Modern
    • 2
      Compatible
    • 2
      Very easy to learning to HTML
    • 2
      Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
    • 2
      Portability
    CONS OF HTML5
    • 2
      Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
    • 1
      Long and winding code

    related HTML5 posts

    Shared insights
    on
    MySQLMySQLPHPPHPJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5

    Hey guys, I need some advice on one thing. Currently, I am a fresher and know HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, PHP and, MySQL. Recently I got a client project through one of my friends and he wants me to build an E-learning Management System. Are these skills enough to build an LMS website?

    Thanks in advance!! ;)

    See more
    Jan Vlnas
    Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 482.4K views
    Shared insights
    on
    HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

    Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

    See more
    PHP logo

    PHP

    146.4K
    4.6K
    A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
    146.4K
    4.6K
    PROS OF PHP
    • 954
      Large community
    • 820
      Open source
    • 767
      Easy deployment
    • 487
      Great frameworks
    • 387
      The best glue on the web
    • 235
      Continual improvements
    • 185
      Good old web
    • 145
      Web foundation
    • 135
      Community packages
    • 125
      Tool support
    • 35
      Used by wordpress
    • 34
      Excellent documentation
    • 29
      Used by Facebook
    • 23
      Because of Symfony
    • 21
      Dynamic Language
    • 17
      Easy to learn
    • 17
      Cheap hosting
    • 15
      Very powerful web language
    • 14
      Awesome Language and easy to implement
    • 14
      Fast development
    • 14
      Because of Laravel
    • 13
      Composer
    • 12
      Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
    • 9
      Easiest deployment
    • 8
      Readable Code
    • 8
      Fast
    • 7
      Most of the web uses it
    • 7
      Short development lead times
    • 7
      Worst popularity quality ratio
    • 7
      Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
    • 6
      Faster then ever
    • 6
      Simple, flexible yet Scalable
    • 5
      Open source and large community
    • 4
      Easy to use and learn
    • 4
      Great developer experience
    • 4
      Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
    • 4
      Is like one zip of air
    • 4
      Open source and great framework
    • 4
      Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
    • 4
      Cheap to own
    • 4
      Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
    • 4
      I have no choice :(
    • 2
      Hard not to use
    • 2
      Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
    • 2
      Interpreted at the run time
    • 2
      Walk away
    • 2
      FFI
    • 2
      Safe the planet
    • 2
      Used by STOMT
    • 2
      Fault tolerance
    • 1
      Simplesaml
    • 1
      Secure
    • 1
      It can get you a lamborghini
    • 1
      Bando
    • 0
      Secure
    • 0
      Largr community
    CONS OF PHP
    • 21
      So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
    • 16
      Inconsistent API
    • 8
      Fragmented community
    • 6
      Not secure
    • 3
      No routing system
    • 3
      Hard to debug
    • 2
      Old

    related PHP posts

    Nick Rockwell
    SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.4M views

    When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

    So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

    React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

    Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

    See more

    Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

    I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

    I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

    See more