StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. PHP-FPM vs runit

PHP-FPM vs runit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

runit
runit
Stacks4
Followers10
Votes0
PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Stacks121
Followers119
Votes0

PHP-FPM vs runit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

PHP-FPM (PHP FastCGI Process Manager) and runit are both process management tools commonly used in web applications for different purposes. Here are the key differences between the two:

1. Flexibility in process management: PHP-FPM is specifically designed for managing PHP processes, providing more specialized features for handling PHP requests efficiently. In contrast, runit is a more general-purpose process supervisor that can manage any type of process, not limited to PHP instances.

2. Dependency on languages: PHP-FPM is tightly integrated with PHP, as it serves as a FastCGI manager for PHP applications. On the other hand, runit is language-agnostic and can be used to manage processes written in various programming languages, offering more versatility in process management.

3. System resource usage: PHP-FPM can be more resource-intensive compared to runit, as it is optimized for PHP applications and may consume more memory and CPU resources. Runit, being a lightweight and efficient process supervisor, tends to have minimal impact on system resources.

4. Monitoring and logging capabilities: PHP-FPM provides specific monitoring and logging functionalities tailored for PHP processes, making it easier to track and troubleshoot PHP-related issues. In contrast, runit offers more general monitoring and logging capabilities that can be applied to a wider range of processes.

5. Community support and documentation: PHP-FPM, being a widely used PHP-specific tool, has a larger community base and more extensive documentation available for PHP developers. Runit, while well-supported in its own right, may have less specialized resources and community support compared to PHP-FPM.

6. Configuration and setup complexity: PHP-FPM configurations are typically more complex due to its specialized focus on PHP process management, requiring specific settings for PHP applications. Runit, with its more general approach, may offer a simpler and more straightforward configuration setup for managing various types of processes.

In Summary, PHP-FPM and runit differ in their focus on process management, integration with specific languages, resource usage, monitoring capabilities, community support, and configuration complexity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

runit
runit
PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM

It is a cross-platform Unix init scheme with service supervision, a replacement for sysvinit, and other init schemes. It runs on GNU/Linux, *BSD, MacOSX, Solaris, and can easily be adapted to other Unix operating systems.

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

Cross-platform ;Service supervision;Easily be adapted to other Unix operating systems
-
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
121
Followers
10
Followers
119
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Gentoo Linux
Gentoo Linux
macOS
macOS
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
OpenBSD
OpenBSD
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to runit, PHP-FPM?

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

delayed_job

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Cron

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

Que

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase