StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. PHP-MVC vs Zend Framework

PHP-MVC vs Zend Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Stacks262
Followers215
Votes48
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3

PHP-MVC vs Zend Framework: What are the differences?

  1. Code organization: In PHP-MVC, developers can organize code in a Model-View-Controller architecture to separate concerns, while in Zend Framework, the organization follows a more modular approach with components and namespaces allowing for better reusability.

  2. Community support: PHP-MVC frameworks have a larger community base compared to Zend Framework, leading to more resources, tutorials, and plugins readily available for PHP-MVC frameworks.

  3. Learning curve: Zend Framework typically has a steeper learning curve compared to PHP-MVC frameworks due to its extensive feature set and complex architecture, making it more suitable for experienced developers.

  4. Flexibility and customization: PHP-MVC frameworks offer more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to choose specific components and libraries they need for their project, while Zend Framework has a more opinionated structure that might limit customization.

  5. Performance: The performance of Zend Framework is generally faster compared to PHP-MVC frameworks due to its optimized codebase and caching mechanisms, making it a preferred choice for large-scale applications with high traffic.

  6. Integration with third-party services: Zend Framework provides seamless integration with various third-party services and APIs through its extensive library of pre-built components, making it easier to work with external services compared to PHP-MVC frameworks.

In Summary, PHP-MVC and Zend Framework differ in code organization, community support, learning curve, flexibility, performance, and integration with third-party services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC

It is an open source framework for developing web applications and services using PHP 5.3+. It uses 100% object-oriented code and utilizes most of the new features of namely namespaces, late static binding, lambda functions and closures.

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Pure object oriented web application framework; Advanced MVC implementation; Supports multi databases including PostgreSQL, SQLite etc; Simple cloud API; Session management; Data encryption; Flexible URI Routing; Zend provides RESTful API development support.
-
Statistics
Stacks
262
Stacks
106
Followers
215
Followers
222
Votes
48
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 25
    Open source
  • 11
    Community
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Many library
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Integrations
Expressive
Expressive
PHP
PHP
GitHub
GitHub
Webex
Webex
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Zend Framework, PHP-MVC?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase