Playwright vs Serverless Chrome

Overview

Serverless Chrome

Stacks7

Followers25

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.9K

Forks280

Playwright

Stacks613

Followers586

Votes81

GitHub Stars79.0K

Forks4.8K

Playwright vs Serverless Chrome: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Playwright and Serverless Chrome are outlined below:

1. **Automation Capabilities**: Playwright is a comprehensive automation tool that supports multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, while Serverless Chrome is specifically designed to run headless Chrome instances in a serverless environment.
   
2. **Browser Context Management**: Playwright offers a more advanced browser context management system, allowing more sophisticated control over cookies, storage, permissions, and other aspects compared to Serverless Chrome.

3. **Testing Framework Integration**: Playwright integrates seamlessly with popular testing frameworks like Jest and Mocha, providing a robust testing environment with various features. Serverless Chrome, on the other hand, requires additional setups to be integrated with testing frameworks.

4. **Architecture**: Playwright is built on top of the CDP (Chrome DevTools Protocol) and provides a high-level API for automation tasks. In contrast, Serverless Chrome relies on Google Chrome’s Puppeteer under the hood to handle automation tasks.

5. **Performance**: Playwright is known for its speed and efficiency in running automated scripts due to its built-in parallel execution capabilities. Serverless Chrome may have slight performance limitations when compared to Playwright in certain scenarios.

6. **Community Support**: Playwright has a larger and more active community that contributes to its continuous development and enhancement, while Serverless Chrome may have limited community support and updates.

In Summary, Playwright and Serverless Chrome differ in their automation capabilities, browser context management, testing framework integration, architecture, performance, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Serverless Chrome	Playwright
The aim of this project is to provide the scaffolding for using Headless Chrome during a serverless function invocation. Serverless Chrome takes care of building and bundling the Chrome binaries and making sure Chrome is running when your serverless function executes. In addition, this project also provides a few "example" handlers for common patterns (e.g. taking a screenshot of a page, printing to PDF, some scraping, etc.)	It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
-	Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.9K	GitHub Stars 79.0K
GitHub Forks 280	GitHub Forks 4.8K
Stacks 7	Stacks 613
Followers 25	Followers 586
Votes 0	Votes 81
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 15 Cross browser 11 Open source 9 Test Runner with Playwright/test 7 Well documented 7 Promise based Cons 12 Less help 3 Node based 2 Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
Serverless Yarn AWS Lambda	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Serverless Chrome, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

Playwright vs Serverless Chrome: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Playwright and Serverless Chrome are outlined below:

1. **Automation Capabilities**: Playwright is a comprehensive automation tool that supports multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, while Serverless Chrome is specifically designed to run headless Chrome instances in a serverless environment.
   
2. **Browser Context Management**: Playwright offers a more advanced browser context management system, allowing more sophisticated control over cookies, storage, permissions, and other aspects compared to Serverless Chrome.

3. **Testing Framework Integration**: Playwright integrates seamlessly with popular testing frameworks like Jest and Mocha, providing a robust testing environment with various features. Serverless Chrome, on the other hand, requires additional setups to be integrated with testing frameworks.

4. **Architecture**: Playwright is built on top of the CDP (Chrome DevTools Protocol) and provides a high-level API for automation tasks. In contrast, Serverless Chrome relies on Google Chrome’s Puppeteer under the hood to handle automation tasks.

5. **Performance**: Playwright is known for its speed and efficiency in running automated scripts due to its built-in parallel execution capabilities. Serverless Chrome may have slight performance limitations when compared to Playwright in certain scenarios.

6. **Community Support**: Playwright has a larger and more active community that contributes to its continuous development and enhancement, while Serverless Chrome may have limited community support and updates.

In Summary, Playwright and Serverless Chrome differ in their automation capabilities, browser context management, testing framework integration, architecture, performance, and community support.

Playwright vs Serverless Chrome

Overview