StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Polymer vs Tailwind CSS

Polymer vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Polymer
Polymer
Stacks557
Followers463
Votes122
GitHub Stars22.1K
Forks2.0K
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245

Polymer vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown text, we will analyze the key differences between Polymer and Tailwind CSS for website development.

1. **Syntax Flexibility**: Polymer follows a strict coding structure and enforces the use of web components, while Tailwind CSS offers a utility-first approach, allowing developers to quickly style elements using pre-defined classes.
2. **Componentization**: Polymer promotes the use of reusable web components, making it easier to build complex UI elements, whereas Tailwind CSS focuses on utility classes and does not emphasize component-based design.
3. **Customization Options**: Polymer provides a more customizable approach to styling components by allowing developers to define their own CSS properties within components, whereas Tailwind CSS relies on predefined utility classes for styling.
4. **Performance**: Polymer uses Shadow DOM to encapsulate styles and scripts within components, reducing the chances of styles leaking out and affecting other elements, whereas Tailwind CSS generates large amounts of CSS, which can impact page load times.
5. **Learning Curve**: Polymer requires a good understanding of web components and the Polymer library to use effectively, making it more complex for beginners, whereas Tailwind CSS offers a more accessible learning curve due to its utility-first approach and easy-to-use classes.
6. **Community Support**: Polymer has a smaller community compared to Tailwind CSS, which has gained popularity for its ease of use and rapid development capabilities.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Polymer and Tailwind CSS can help developers choose the right framework for their web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Polymer, Tailwind CSS

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments
Gericke
Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET CoreJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReact

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Polymer
Polymer
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

-
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
557
Stacks
4.8K
Followers
463
Followers
3.1K
Votes
122
Votes
245
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 52
    Web components
  • 30
    Material design
  • 14
    HTML
  • 13
    Components
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure

What are some alternatives to Polymer, Tailwind CSS?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase