Pylint vs Standard JS

Overview

Pylint

Stacks873

Followers97

Votes17

Standard JS

Stacks80

Followers93

Votes1

Pylint vs Standard JS: What are the differences?


### Introduction
Pylint and Standard JS are both static code analysis tools used in different programming languages. While Pylint is used for Python, Standard JS is used for JavaScript.

1. **Language Support**: The key difference between Pylint and Standard JS is the languages they support. Pylint is specifically designed for Python code analysis, while Standard JS is tailored for JavaScript code analysis.
   
2. **Configuration and Customization**: Pylint offers extensive configuration options and customizability for different coding standards and requirements, allowing developers to fine-tune the analysis process. In contrast, Standard JS has predefined rules and configurations suitable for most JavaScript projects but offers limited customization options.
   
3. **Package Ecosystem Integration**: Pylint integrates well with the Python package ecosystem and can analyze third-party libraries and frameworks seamlessly. On the other hand, Standard JS may have limitations in analyzing third-party libraries due to its focus on core JavaScript functionality.
   
4. **Rule Set**: Pylint comes with a comprehensive set of predefined rules that cover a wide range of code quality and style issues commonly found in Python codebases. Standard JS also provides rules for common JavaScript coding practices but may not offer the depth and specificity of Pylint's rule set.
   
5. **Community Support**: Pylint has a strong and active community that regularly updates and maintains the tool, ensuring compatibility with the latest Python language features and best practices. Standard JS, being focused on JavaScript, benefits from the vibrant JavaScript developer community, which contributes to its continuous improvement and development.
   
6. **Integration with Development Tools**: Pylint can be seamlessly integrated into popular Python IDEs and text editors, providing real-time feedback and suggestions during the coding process. Standard JS offers similar integrations for JavaScript development environments, enhancing the developer experience and productivity.

In Summary, Pylint and Standard JS differ in language support, configuration flexibility, package ecosystem integration, rule set comprehensiveness, community support, and integration with development tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pylint	Standard JS
It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.	It is a Style guide, with linter & automatic code fixer. It is a way to enforce consistent style in your project. It automatically formats code.
Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings	-
Statistics
Stacks 873	Stacks 80
Followers 97	Followers 93
Votes 17	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Command Line 2 Spell Check strings & comments 2 Code score & directions 2 Standards 2 Pre-commit checks	Pros 1 Free 0 Customizable
Integrations
FreeBSD Debian Vim Windows Mac OS X TextMate Visual Studio Komodo IDE Eclipse Visual Studio Code	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Pylint, Standard JS?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Pylint vs Standard JS: What are the differences?


### Introduction
Pylint and Standard JS are both static code analysis tools used in different programming languages. While Pylint is used for Python, Standard JS is used for JavaScript.

1. **Language Support**: The key difference between Pylint and Standard JS is the languages they support. Pylint is specifically designed for Python code analysis, while Standard JS is tailored for JavaScript code analysis.
   
2. **Configuration and Customization**: Pylint offers extensive configuration options and customizability for different coding standards and requirements, allowing developers to fine-tune the analysis process. In contrast, Standard JS has predefined rules and configurations suitable for most JavaScript projects but offers limited customization options.
   
3. **Package Ecosystem Integration**: Pylint integrates well with the Python package ecosystem and can analyze third-party libraries and frameworks seamlessly. On the other hand, Standard JS may have limitations in analyzing third-party libraries due to its focus on core JavaScript functionality.
   
4. **Rule Set**: Pylint comes with a comprehensive set of predefined rules that cover a wide range of code quality and style issues commonly found in Python codebases. Standard JS also provides rules for common JavaScript coding practices but may not offer the depth and specificity of Pylint's rule set.
   
5. **Community Support**: Pylint has a strong and active community that regularly updates and maintains the tool, ensuring compatibility with the latest Python language features and best practices. Standard JS, being focused on JavaScript, benefits from the vibrant JavaScript developer community, which contributes to its continuous improvement and development.
   
6. **Integration with Development Tools**: Pylint can be seamlessly integrated into popular Python IDEs and text editors, providing real-time feedback and suggestions during the coding process. Standard JS offers similar integrations for JavaScript development environments, enhancing the developer experience and productivity.

Pylint vs Standard JS

Overview