StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Qemu vs Xen

Qemu vs Xen

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qemu
Qemu
Stacks105
Followers131
Votes3
Xen
Xen
Stacks30
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars744
Forks363

Qemu vs Xen: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Qemu and Xen

Qemu and Xen are two popular hypervisor technologies used in virtualization. While both serve the purpose of creating and managing virtual machines (VMs), they have some key differences in terms of architecture, features, and usage.

  1. Virtualization Approach: Qemu is a full-system emulator that offers complete hardware virtualization, providing an emulated environment for running guest operating systems. On the other hand, Xen is a type-1 hypervisor that runs directly on the hardware, allowing multiple VMs to run on a single physical machine by sharing its resources.

  2. Performance: Qemu, being an emulator, provides a high level of compatibility and supports running VMs on different hardware architectures and platforms. However, this comes at the cost of performance, as the emulation process introduces some overhead. Xen, being a bare-metal hypervisor, has a more direct access to hardware resources, resulting in better performance and lower overhead.

  3. Isolation: Xen provides stronger isolation between VMs compared to Qemu. Xen uses para-virtualization or hardware-assisted virtualization techniques to run VMs, which ensures that each VM runs in its own isolated environment and has no direct access to the underlying hardware. In contrast, Qemu relies on full emulation and may not provide the same level of isolation.

  4. Management: Qemu is often used as a stand-alone emulator or in combination with other tools like KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) for better performance. It provides a more flexible and user-friendly management interface for managing VMs. Xen, on the other hand, provides a complete infrastructure for managing VMs, including tools like XenCenter and XenServer, which offer more advanced features for managing large-scale VM deployments.

  5. Community and Support: Qemu has a large and active open-source community, with regular updates and a wide range of contributors. It has been widely adopted and integrated into many virtualization solutions and cloud platforms. Xen also has a strong community and is supported by major vendors, but it has a more focused user base and is commonly used in enterprise environments.

  6. Ecosystem: Qemu has a larger ecosystem compared to Xen, with support for a wide range of operating systems and architectures. It can be used for various purposes, including development, testing, and running legacy software. Xen, on the other hand, is mainly used for server virtualization and cloud computing, with a focus on performance, scalability, and security.

In summary, Qemu is a full-system emulator that provides a flexible and versatile virtualization solution with broad hardware and OS support, while Xen is a type-1 hypervisor that offers high-performance virtualization with strong isolation and management capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qemu
Qemu
Xen
Xen

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

machine emulator and virtualizer; dynamic translation;
Xen 4.10 or Newer; Archive; Overview; Limits; Toolstack and Tools; Features; Interoperability / Hardware Support; Device Models and Virtual Firmware.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
744
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
363
Stacks
105
Stacks
30
Followers
131
Followers
43
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Linux
Linux
KVM
KVM
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Datadog
Datadog
Spring Data
Spring Data

What are some alternatives to Qemu, Xen?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana