React Native Material Design vs SwiftUI

Overview

React Native Material Design

Stacks30

Followers135

Votes5

SwiftUI

Stacks590

Followers567

Votes6

React Native Material Design vs SwiftUI: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
In this comparison, we will look at the key differences between React Native Material Design and SwiftUI for mobile app development.

1. **Language Used**: React Native Material Design uses JavaScript as its primary language, while SwiftUI uses Swift, a programming language developed by Apple. This difference in language choice can affect the development process and overall performance of the apps.

2. **Cross-Platform Support**: React Native Material Design allows for cross-platform development, meaning developers can write code once and deploy it on both iOS and Android platforms. On the other hand, SwiftUI is exclusive to iOS and macOS development, limiting its cross-platform capabilities.

3. **Library Ecosystem**: React Native Material Design benefits from a vast library ecosystem with numerous third-party libraries and components available for integration. SwiftUI, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller ecosystem with fewer third-party options.

4. **Development Environment**: React Native Material Design offers hot reloading, allowing developers to see changes in real-time as they make modifications to the code. SwiftUI lacks this feature, which can slow down the development process.

5. **Learning Curve**: React Native Material Design is easier to learn for developers with web development experience, as it leverages familiar technologies like JavaScript and React. SwiftUI, on the other hand, requires developers to adapt to the Swift language and the SwiftUI framework, which can pose a steeper learning curve.

6. **Community Support**: React Native Material Design is backed by a large and active community of developers, providing ample resources, tutorials, and support. While SwiftUI is gaining popularity, its community is still growing, which may result in fewer resources and support for developers.

In Summary, React Native Material Design and SwiftUI differ in language used, cross-platform support, library ecosystem, development environment, learning curve, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

React Native Material Design	SwiftUI
An open source project which aims to bring Material Design to Android through React Native by Facebook. The library is made up of many components, which can be found in the sidebar.	Provides views, controls, and layout structures for declaring your app's user interface. The framework provides event handlers for delivering taps, gestures, and other types of input to your app.
-	Declarative Syntax; Design Tools; Drag and drop; Dynamic replacement; Previews; Native on All Apple Platforms; Generate dynamic, interactive previews of your custom views; Define interactions from taps, clicks, and swipes to fine-grained gestures; Control and respond to the flow of data and changes within your app’s models; Integrate SwiftUI views into existing apps, and embed AppKit, UIKit, and WatchKit views and controllers into SwiftUI view hierarchies; Present your content onscreen and handle user interactions
Statistics
Stacks 30	Stacks 590
Followers 135	Followers 567
Votes 5	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Unmaintained 1 Android-only	Pros 2 XCode Canvas feature 2 Live previews 2 Smaller Scalable views
Integrations
React Native	macOS Swift Xcode

What are some alternatives to React Native Material Design, SwiftUI?

Weex

Weex renders code in native widgets in Android & iOS and helps preserve the quality of user experience on critical platforms.

ComponentKit

ComponentKit is an Objective-C++ view framework for iOS that is heavily inspired by React. It takes a functional, declarative approach to building UI. It was built to power Facebook's News Feed and is now used throughout the Facebook iOS app.

Ratchet

Made by the creators of Twitter Bootstrap, Ratchet is a library that allows you to build mobile apps with simple HTML, CSS, and JS components.

jQuery Mobile

jQuery Mobile is a HTML5-based user interface system designed to make responsive web sites and apps that are accessible on all smartphone, tablet and desktop devices.

React Native Paper

Material design for React Native.

CoreRender

React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs.

Reagent

It allows you to define efficient React components using nothing but plain ClojureScript functions and data, that describe your UI using a Hiccup-like syntax.

react-native-ui-kitten

react-native-ui-kitten is a framework that contains a set of commonly used UI components styled in a similar way. The main idea of this framework is to move style definitions into a specific place making components reusable and styled in a single way. You just focus on business logic and it takes care of visual appearance.

Classy

Not CSS. Instead of trying to force UIKit to fit CSS syntax, properties, conventions and constructs. Classy is a stylesheet system built from the ground up to work in harmony with UIKit. It borrows the best ideas from CSS and introduces new syntax, conventions and constructs where appropriate.

ChocolateChip-UI

ChocolateChip-UI is a framework for making mobile Web apps. It has three components: semantic HTML5 markup, CSS and JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

React Native Material Design vs SwiftUI: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
In this comparison, we will look at the key differences between React Native Material Design and SwiftUI for mobile app development.

1. **Language Used**: React Native Material Design uses JavaScript as its primary language, while SwiftUI uses Swift, a programming language developed by Apple. This difference in language choice can affect the development process and overall performance of the apps.

2. **Cross-Platform Support**: React Native Material Design allows for cross-platform development, meaning developers can write code once and deploy it on both iOS and Android platforms. On the other hand, SwiftUI is exclusive to iOS and macOS development, limiting its cross-platform capabilities.

3. **Library Ecosystem**: React Native Material Design benefits from a vast library ecosystem with numerous third-party libraries and components available for integration. SwiftUI, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller ecosystem with fewer third-party options.

4. **Development Environment**: React Native Material Design offers hot reloading, allowing developers to see changes in real-time as they make modifications to the code. SwiftUI lacks this feature, which can slow down the development process.

5. **Learning Curve**: React Native Material Design is easier to learn for developers with web development experience, as it leverages familiar technologies like JavaScript and React. SwiftUI, on the other hand, requires developers to adapt to the Swift language and the SwiftUI framework, which can pose a steeper learning curve.

6. **Community Support**: React Native Material Design is backed by a large and active community of developers, providing ample resources, tutorials, and support. While SwiftUI is gaining popularity, its community is still growing, which may result in fewer resources and support for developers.

In Summary, React Native Material Design and SwiftUI differ in language used, cross-platform support, library ecosystem, development environment, learning curve, and community support.

React Native Material Design vs SwiftUI

Overview