React Native vs RubyMotion

Overview

RubyMotion

Stacks25

Followers54

Votes25

React Native

Stacks34.4K

Followers29.5K

Votes1.2K

GitHub Stars124.4K

Forks24.9K

React Native vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?

Introduction

React Native and RubyMotion are both popular frameworks used for building mobile applications. While they both serve the purpose of developing cross-platform apps, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: React Native uses a JavaScript-based library for building user interfaces, whereas RubyMotion utilizes the Ruby language for iOS and macOS app development. This difference in architecture affects the development process, tooling, and overall code structure.
Development Speed: React Native allows for faster development due to its hot reloading feature, which instantly updates the application while coding. On the other hand, RubyMotion offers a more traditional development workflow, which may require recompiling and relaunching the app for changes to take effect.
Community and Ecosystem: React Native has a larger and more active community, which results in a wider range of third-party libraries, components, and resources available for developers. RubyMotion, while having a dedicated community, has a smaller ecosystem overall, making it potentially more limited in terms of available tools and resources.
Platform Support: React Native supports both iOS and Android platforms, allowing developers to build apps for both operating systems concurrently. RubyMotion, on the other hand, primarily focuses on iOS and macOS development, although there is limited support for Android through third-party tools.
Integration with Native Code: React Native provides robust support for integrating custom native code, making it easier to access specific device features and APIs that might not be available in the framework itself. In comparison, RubyMotion's integration with native code can be more complex and requires a deeper understanding of the platform-specific APIs.
Learning Curve: React Native utilizes JavaScript, a widely used language, which makes it more accessible to developers with previous web development experience. RubyMotion, on the other hand, relies on the Ruby programming language, which may require a steeper learning curve for developers who are unfamiliar with Ruby.

In Summary, React Native offers a faster development speed, a more extensive community, support for both iOS and Android, and easier integration with native code, while RubyMotion focuses primarily on iOS and macOS development, has a smaller ecosystem, and requires familiarity with the Ruby programming language.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on RubyMotion, React Native

Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k

Comments

Andrea

May 26, 2020

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

Vue Native

React

I'm a huge fan of Vue.js and I'm pretty comfortable with it. I need to build a mobile app for my company and I was now wondering whether I could make use of VueJS with Vue Native instead of switching to React. I know Vue Native builds on top of RN. My question is whether I'd have as much freedom with Vue Native over RN and whether you feel like Vue Native is "production ready" or not. Not sure of which shortcomings I may find using Vue Native... Thanks a lot!!!

336k views336k

Comments

Furqan

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

React Native

Hello guys, I am new here. So, if I posted without specific guidelines, please ignore.

Basically, I am an iOS developer and developing native apps for the last three years. Recently, I started learning React Native to develop apps for both platforms. If anyone out there knows any useful resources that will become a better react native developer.

@{#newbie}|topic:null|

325k views325k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RubyMotion	React Native
RubyMotion lets you quickly develop cross-platform native apps for iOS, Android and OS X, all using your favorite editor and the awesome Ruby language you know and love.	React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.
-	Native iOS Components;Asynchronous Execution;Touch Handling;Flexbox and Styling; Polyfills
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 124.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 24.9K
Stacks 25	Stacks 34.4K
Followers 54	Followers 29.5K
Votes 25	Votes 1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Ruby Syntax 4 Great Community 4 Editor + Terminal workflow; minimal Xcode involvement 3 Great gems, libraries, and frameworks 3 Fast Prototyping	Pros 214 Learn once write everywhere 174 Cross platform 169 Javascript 122 Native ios components 69 Built by facebook Cons 23 Javascript 19 Built by facebook 12 Cant use CSS 4 30 FPS Limit 2 Slow
Integrations
Ruby	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to RubyMotion, React Native?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Related Comparisons

React Native vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture: React Native uses a JavaScript-based library for building user interfaces, whereas RubyMotion utilizes the Ruby language for iOS and macOS app development. This difference in architecture affects the development process, tooling, and overall code structure.
Development Speed: React Native allows for faster development due to its hot reloading feature, which instantly updates the application while coding. On the other hand, RubyMotion offers a more traditional development workflow, which may require recompiling and relaunching the app for changes to take effect.
Community and Ecosystem: React Native has a larger and more active community, which results in a wider range of third-party libraries, components, and resources available for developers. RubyMotion, while having a dedicated community, has a smaller ecosystem overall, making it potentially more limited in terms of available tools and resources.
Platform Support: React Native supports both iOS and Android platforms, allowing developers to build apps for both operating systems concurrently. RubyMotion, on the other hand, primarily focuses on iOS and macOS development, although there is limited support for Android through third-party tools.
Integration with Native Code: React Native provides robust support for integrating custom native code, making it easier to access specific device features and APIs that might not be available in the framework itself. In comparison, RubyMotion's integration with native code can be more complex and requires a deeper understanding of the platform-specific APIs.
Learning Curve: React Native utilizes JavaScript, a widely used language, which makes it more accessible to developers with previous web development experience. RubyMotion, on the other hand, relies on the Ruby programming language, which may require a steeper learning curve for developers who are unfamiliar with Ruby.

React Native vs RubyMotion

Overview

React Native vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?