What is s3_disk_util and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to s3_disk_util
AWS AmplifyA JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends. ...
AWS CLIIt is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. With just one tool to download and configure, you can control multiple AWS services from the command line and automate them through scripts. ...
LocalStackLocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications. ...
AWS ShellThe AWS Command Line Interface is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. ...
troposphereThe troposphere library allows for easier creation of the AWS CloudFormation JSON by writing Python code to describe the AWS resources. troposphere also includes some basic support for OpenStack resources via Heat. ...
awlessawless is a fast, powerful and easy-to-use command line interface (CLI) to manage Amazon Web Services. ...
Bash-My-AWSIt is a simple but extremely powerful set of CLI commands for managing resources on Amazon Web Services. They harness the power of Amazon's AWSCLI, while abstracting away verbosity. The project implements some innovative patterns but (arguably) remains simple, beautiful and readable. ...
VantageIt is an alternative to the AWS console focused on developer experience and cost transparency. It is meant to work alongside your existing automation tools. ...
s3_disk_util alternatives & related posts
- GraphQL4
- Better with Relations and Security3
- Cheaper2
- Flexible Auth options2
- Continuous deployment1
- Backed by Amazon1
- Free tier is limited2
- Steep Learning Curve1
related AWS Amplify posts
I am currently working on a long term mobile app project. Current stack: Frontend: Dart/Flutter Backend: Go, AWS Resources (AWS Lambda, Amazon DynamoDB, etc.) Since there are only two developers and we have limited time and resources, we are looking for a BAAS like Firebase or AWS Amplify to handle auth and push notifications for now. We are prioritizing developing speed so we can iterate quickly. The only problem is that AWS amplify support for flutter is in developer preview and has limited capabilities (We have tested it out in our app). Firebase is the more mature option. It has great support for flutter and has more than we need for auth, notifications, etc. My question is that, if we choose firebase, we would be stuck with using two different cloud providers. Is this bad, or is this even a problem? I am willing to change anything on the backend architecture wise, so any suggestions would be greatly appreciated as I am somewhat unfamiliar with Google Cloud Platform. Thank you.
I am now building a React Native app, and I don't know what to choose for my backend between AWS Amplify and Firebase. Which one fits more with react native?
related AWS CLI posts
- Integration with Python/nosetests4
- Local/offline testing4
- No dependency on cloud4
- Available as Docker image3
- Continuous integration3
- The correct URL is https://github.com/localstack/locals3
- Integration with Java/JUnit3
- Increases dev speed3
- Easy to use3
- Cost effective testing3
- Doesn't work well on Windows2
- No proper admin panel/web UI1
related LocalStack posts
related AWS Shell posts
- Infrastructure as code0
related troposphere posts
- Easy Setup3
- Powerful commands to access any AWS service3
- An intuitive UI of output2
related awless posts
related Bash-My-AWS posts