StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Semantic UI vs Skeleton

Semantic UI vs Skeleton

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Skeleton
Skeleton
Stacks54
Followers100
Votes24
GitHub Stars19.7K
Forks3.1K

Semantic UI vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

Markdown is a lightweight markup language used to format text on the web.

  1. Grid System: Semantic UI uses a 12-column grid system, while Skeleton uses a 16-column grid system. This means that Semantic UI may offer more precise control over layout, while Skeleton may provide more versatility in creating complex multi-column layouts.

  2. Component Library: Semantic UI offers a comprehensive library of pre-designed components like buttons, forms, and menus, making it easier to create visually appealing interfaces. On the other hand, Skeleton focuses more on providing a minimal set of base styles without pre-designed components, allowing developers more flexibility and control in designing custom components.

  3. Theming and Customization: Semantic UI provides a built-in theming system that allows users to easily customize the look and feel of their website using predefined themes or creating their own. In contrast, Skeleton emphasizes simplicity and minimalism, which may be preferred by developers who do not require extensive theming options.

  4. JavaScript Integration: Semantic UI includes integrated JavaScript components, such as dropdowns, modals, and tabs, that can be easily added to enhance website functionality without much additional coding. Skeleton, however, does not provide a built-in JavaScript library, requiring developers to rely on external plugins or custom scripts for interactive elements.

  5. Documentation and Support: Semantic UI offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and a thriving community for support, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. In comparison, Skeleton has more limited documentation and support resources, which may require developers to rely more on experimentation and self-learning.

  6. File Size and Performance: Semantic UI, due to its comprehensive component library and theming options, may result in larger file sizes and potentially slower performance compared to the lightweight and minimalist approach of Skeleton. This could be a consideration for developers prioritizing website speed and optimization.

In Summary, Semantic UI and Skeleton differ in their grid systems, component libraries, theming options, JavaScript integration, documentation, and file size/performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, Skeleton

Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Skeleton
Skeleton

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
19.7K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
992
Stacks
54
Followers
1.5K
Followers
100
Votes
673
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 9
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Responsive
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Fantastically straight forward
  • 1
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 0
    Have to make design decisions
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Skeleton?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase