StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Semantic UI vs Tailwind CSS

Semantic UI vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245

Semantic UI vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

Semantic UI and Tailwind CSS are two popular CSS frameworks used for building modern web applications, each with its unique approach to styling and layout. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Grid System: Semantic UI provides a fluid and responsive grid system that allows for easy layout customization. It uses classes like ui grid to define grid structures with various column widths. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS utilizes a utility-first approach, offering a comprehensive set of responsive grid classes that can be directly used in HTML markup. This allows for more flexibility in creating custom grid layouts without the need for additional CSS classes or frameworks.

  2. Styling Approach: Semantic UI follows a more opinionated and pre-designed approach to styling components. It provides a wide range of ready-to-use components with predefined styles and themes. In contrast, Tailwind CSS takes a highly customizable and utility-based approach, where you can directly apply utility classes to HTML elements to achieve specific design properties. This gives developers more control and freedom to create their own unique styles without being constrained by predefined UI patterns.

  3. Theming Options: Semantic UI offers a theme system that allows developers to customize the appearance of components by modifying variables or creating their own themes. It provides an extensive set of built-in themes to choose from, making it easy to change the overall look and feel of the UI. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in theming system. Instead, it focuses on providing a robust set of utility classes that can be combined and customized to achieve any desired design style.

  4. File Size: Semantic UI has a larger file size compared to Tailwind CSS. This is mainly due to the fact that Semantic UI includes a wide range of pre-designed components and themes, resulting in more CSS and JavaScript code being included in the final bundle. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, takes a more minimalistic approach and focuses on providing a comprehensive set of utility classes, resulting in a smaller file size overall.

  5. Learning Curve: Semantic UI has a steeper learning curve compared to Tailwind CSS, especially for beginners. It has its own set of class names and conventions, which can take some time to get used to. In contrast, Tailwind CSS follows a more intuitive and self-explanatory naming convention for utility classes, making it easier to understand and use. This makes Tailwind CSS a popular choice for developers who want to quickly prototype or develop websites without spending much time on custom styling.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Semantic UI has a strong community and a wide array of plugins and extensions that can extend its functionality. It has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base, which means there are more resources and support available. Tailwind CSS, although relatively newer, has gained significant traction and a growing community. It also offers a plugin system and has integrations with popular frameworks like React and Vue.js, making it a versatile choice for modern web development.

In summary, Semantic UI provides a pre-designed, themable UI framework with a fluid grid system, while Tailwind CSS focuses on utility classes, flexibility, and an extensive ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, Tailwind CSS

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments
Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
992
Stacks
4.8K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
3.1K
Votes
673
Votes
245
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Tailwind CSS?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase