Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ABP Commercial vs Meteor: What are the differences?
ABP Commercial vs Meteor
ABP Commercial and Meteor are both popular frameworks in the web development world, each offering unique features and functionalities for developers. Below are the key differences between ABP Commercial and Meteor:
1. **Architecture**: ABP Commercial follows a modular architecture, allowing developers to easily customize and extend the application using various modules. On the other hand, Meteor is a full-stack platform that provides a seamless integration between the front-end and back-end, reducing the complexity of development.
2. **Data Management**: ABP Commercial has built-in support for various database providers like SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB, making it flexible in terms of data management. In contrast, Meteor comes with its own reactive data management system called Minimongo, which simplifies real-time data updates across the application.
3. **Backend Development**: ABP Commercial provides a set of predefined application services, such as user management, permission system, and audit logging, reducing the need for custom backend development. Meteor, on the other hand, allows developers to quickly build backend logic using JavaScript, making it suitable for rapid application development.
4. **Frontend Framework**: ABP Commercial supports multiple client-side frameworks like Angular, React, and Blazor, giving developers the freedom to choose the best technology for their frontend development. Meteor comes with Blaze, a reactive frontend framework, which may limit the options for developers who prefer other frameworks like React or Vue.
5. **Real-time Communication**: ABP Commercial provides features for real-time communication through SignalR, enabling developers to build interactive and responsive applications. While Meteor has built-in support for WebSockets, allowing for seamless real-time updates without the need for additional configurations.
6. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: ABP Commercial has a growing community of developers and an ecosystem of modules and extensions to enhance the framework's capabilities. Meteor, on the other hand, has a well-established community and a rich ecosystem of packages available through the Atmosphere package manager, providing additional functionalities for developers.
In Summary, ABP Commercial offers a modular architecture with support for multiple frontend frameworks and database providers, while Meteor provides a seamless full-stack integration with its reactive data management system and real-time communication capabilities.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...
Pros of ABP Commercial
- Rapid development4
- Supports micro-service architecture4
- Development productivity tools4
- Professional UI themes3
- Easy to integrate3
- Complete web development platform3
- Enterprise ready, feature rich, pre-built modules3
- Open source ABP framework behind3
- Database-agnostic2
- Premium, fast support2
Pros of Meteor
- Real-time251
- Full stack, one language200
- Best app dev platform available today183
- Data synchronization155
- Javascript152
- Focus on your product not the plumbing118
- Hot code pushes107
- Open source106
- Live page updates102
- Latency compensation92
- Ultra-simple development environment39
- Smart Packages29
- Real time awesome29
- Great for beginners23
- Direct Cordova integration22
- Better than Rails16
- Less moving parts15
- It's just amazing13
- Blaze10
- Great community support8
- Plugins for everything8
- One command spits out android and ios ready apps.6
- It just works5
- 0 to Production in no time5
- Coding Speed4
- Easy deployment4
- Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)4
- You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense4
- Easy yet powerful2
- AngularJS Integration2
- One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS2
- Community2
- Easy Setup1
- Free1
- Nosql1
- Hookie friendly1
- High quality, very few bugs1
- Stack available on Codeanywhere1
- Real time1
- Friendly to use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ABP Commercial
Cons of Meteor
- Does not scale well5
- Hard to debug issues on the server-side4
- Heavily CPU bound4