ActiveMQ vs Apache Camel: What are the differences?
ActiveMQ: A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client. Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License; Apache Camel: A versatile open source integration framework. An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.
ActiveMQ belongs to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack, while Apache Camel can be primarily classified under "Integration Tools".
ActiveMQ is an open source tool with 1.53K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks. Here's a link to ActiveMQ's open source repository on GitHub.
Intuit, Wix, and SoFi are some of the popular companies that use ActiveMQ, whereas Apache Camel is used by Auto Trader, Zola, and opening.io. ActiveMQ has a broader approval, being mentioned in 52 company stacks & 120 developers stacks; compared to Apache Camel, which is listed in 21 company stacks and 30 developer stacks.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is ActiveMQ?
What is Apache Camel?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions