ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ

178
201
+ 1
39
simplehttp
simplehttp

1
4
+ 1
0
Add tool

ActiveMQ vs simplehttp: What are the differences?

Developers describe ActiveMQ as "A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client". Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License. On the other hand, simplehttp is detailed as "A family of libraries and daemons built upon libevent that make high performance HTTP servers simple and straightforward to write". .

ActiveMQ and simplehttp can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

ActiveMQ and simplehttp are both open source tools. ActiveMQ with 1.5K GitHub stars and 1.05K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than simplehttp with 480 GitHub stars and 73 GitHub forks.

What is ActiveMQ?

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

What is simplehttp?

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose ActiveMQ?
Why do developers choose simplehttp?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using ActiveMQ?
    What are the cons of using simplehttp?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use ActiveMQ?
        What companies use simplehttp?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
        What tools integrate with simplehttp?
          No integrations found
          What are some alternatives to ActiveMQ and simplehttp?
          RabbitMQ
          RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
          Kafka
          Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
          Apollo
          Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
          Amazon SQS
          Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
          Celery
          Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about ActiveMQ and simplehttp
          No stack decisions found
          Interest over time
          Reviews of ActiveMQ and simplehttp
          No reviews found
          How developers use ActiveMQ and simplehttp
          Avatar of Casey Smith
          Casey Smith uses ActiveMQActiveMQ

          Remote broker and local client for incoming data feeds. Local broker for republishing data feeds to other systems.

          How much does ActiveMQ cost?
          How much does simplehttp cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          Pricing unavailable
          News about ActiveMQ
          More news
          News about simplehttp
          More news