Actix vs Erlang

Overview

Erlang

Stacks1.4K

Followers749

Votes345

GitHub Stars11.9K

Forks3.0K

Actix

Stacks149

Followers224

Votes14

GitHub Stars9.1K

Forks666

Actix vs Erlang: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Actix and Erlang, focusing on their unique features and capabilities.

Concurrency Model: Actix utilizes the actor model for concurrency, where each actor is an independent unit of state and behavior. In contrast, Erlang follows the actor model as well but uses lightweight processes and message passing for concurrency, providing fault tolerance and isolation between processes.
Language: Actix is built using Rust, a systems programming language known for its performance and safety guarantees. On the other hand, Erlang is a functional programming language specifically designed for building fault-tolerant and highly concurrent systems.
Ecosystem: Actix has a growing ecosystem with a focus on web development and application scalability, providing a robust set of tools and libraries. In comparison, Erlang has a mature ecosystem with a strong emphasis on telecom and distributed systems, featuring battle-tested frameworks like OTP (Open Telecom Platform).
Performance: Actix is known for its high performance and low overhead due to Rust's memory management and optimization features. Erlang, while optimized for concurrency and fault tolerance, may exhibit higher memory consumption compared to Actix in certain use cases.
Community Support: Actix has a relatively smaller community compared to Erlang, which has a large and active community supporting developers with resources, tutorials, and best practices. This community support can significantly impact the learning curve and ease of development for users of each platform.

Summary: In summary, Actix and Erlang differ in their concurrency models, programming languages, ecosystems, performance characteristics, and community support, shaping the unique strengths and weaknesses of each platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Erlang	Actix
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.	It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.
-	Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.9K	GitHub Stars 9.1K
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks 666
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 149
Followers 749	Followers 224
Votes 345	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 62 Concurrency Support 62 Real time, distributed applications 58 Fault tolerance 36 Soft real-time 32 Open source Cons 1 Languange is not popular demand	Pros 6 Really really really fast 3 Rust 3 Very safe 2 Open source Cons 3 Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
No integrations available	ExpressionEngine HTML5 Rust

What are some alternatives to Erlang, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Related Comparisons

Actix vs Erlang: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Actix and Erlang, focusing on their unique features and capabilities.

Concurrency Model: Actix utilizes the actor model for concurrency, where each actor is an independent unit of state and behavior. In contrast, Erlang follows the actor model as well but uses lightweight processes and message passing for concurrency, providing fault tolerance and isolation between processes.
Language: Actix is built using Rust, a systems programming language known for its performance and safety guarantees. On the other hand, Erlang is a functional programming language specifically designed for building fault-tolerant and highly concurrent systems.
Ecosystem: Actix has a growing ecosystem with a focus on web development and application scalability, providing a robust set of tools and libraries. In comparison, Erlang has a mature ecosystem with a strong emphasis on telecom and distributed systems, featuring battle-tested frameworks like OTP (Open Telecom Platform).
Performance: Actix is known for its high performance and low overhead due to Rust's memory management and optimization features. Erlang, while optimized for concurrency and fault tolerance, may exhibit higher memory consumption compared to Actix in certain use cases.
Community Support: Actix has a relatively smaller community compared to Erlang, which has a large and active community supporting developers with resources, tutorials, and best practices. This community support can significantly impact the learning curve and ease of development for users of each platform.

Actix vs Erlang

Overview