Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AIOHTTP

124
142
+ 1
0
asyncio

112
158
+ 1
13
Add tool

AIOHTTP vs asyncio: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AIOHTTP and Asyncio

Introduction: AIOHTTP and asyncio are both Python libraries that are commonly used in web application development. While they are closely related and often used together, they have some key differences that developers should be aware of.

  1. Architecture: AIOHTTP is a web server and client implementation based on the asynchronous framework called asyncio. It provides a higher-level API for building HTTP-based applications. On the other hand, asyncio is a library that provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other concurrency-based primitives.

  2. Concurrency Model: AIOHTTP is designed to handle concurrent requests and responses efficiently using the asyncio event loop. It allows multiple requests to be processed concurrently without blocking the event loop. On the contrary, asyncio allows developers to write asynchronous code using coroutines, which can be used to achieve concurrency without threads. It provides a cooperative multitasking model where functions can be paused and resumed during I/O operations.

  3. HTTP Functionality: AIOHTTP provides an extensive set of tools and features for dealing with HTTP requests and responses. It supports client-side functionality like handling cookies, authentication, and SSL/TLS. It also includes server-side functionality such as routing, middlewares, and WebSocket support. In contrast, asyncio does not provide high-level HTTP functionality out of the box. It focuses more on providing a general framework for writing asynchronous code and does not have built-in support for specific protocols like HTTP.

  4. Ease of Use: AIOHTTP is designed to be user-friendly and provides a simplified API for common web application tasks. It offers a higher-level interface compared to asyncio, which can make it easier for developers to build web applications quickly. On the other hand, asyncio requires a deeper understanding of asynchronous programming concepts and may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  5. Compatibility: AIOHTTP is built on top of asyncio and is fully compatible with it. This means that developers can use asyncio libraries and tools seamlessly with AIOHTTP. On the contrary, asyncio can be used independently of AIOHTTP and can be integrated with other frameworks or libraries that support coroutines.

  6. Community and Support: AIOHTTP has a dedicated community and is widely used in production environments. It has a mature codebase and active development, which means that developers can rely on it for building robust web applications. asyncio, being a part of the Python standard library, also has a large community and is well-supported. It benefits from the wider Python ecosystem and provides developers with a solid foundation for writing asynchronous code.

In Summary, AIOHTTP is a high-level web server and client based on asyncio, providing advanced HTTP functionality and ease of use, while asyncio is a lower-level library for writing asynchronous code using coroutines, focusing more on general concurrency and I/O operations.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AIOHTTP
Pros of asyncio
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 4
      Cooperative Multitasking
    • 4
      I/O Wait
    • 3
      Network Call
    • 2
      I/O bound computation

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is AIOHTTP?

    It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.

    What is asyncio?

    This module provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other related primitives.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention AIOHTTP and asyncio as a desired skillset
    What companies use AIOHTTP?
    What companies use asyncio?
    See which teams inside your own company are using AIOHTTP or asyncio.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AIOHTTP?
    What tools integrate with asyncio?

    Blog Posts

    JavaScriptPythonPubNub+4
    7
    1524
    What are some alternatives to AIOHTTP and asyncio?
    GraphQL
    GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.
    Tornado
    By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.
    Sanic
    Sanic is a Flask-like Python 3.5+ web server that's written to go fast. It's based on the work done by the amazing folks at magicstack. On top of being Flask-like, Sanic supports async request handlers.
    Flask
    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    See all alternatives