Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Airtable

984
861
+ 1
40
Google Forms

85
72
+ 1
0
Add tool

Airtable vs Google Forms: What are the differences?

Introduction

Airtable and Google Forms are both popular tools used for data collection and analysis. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them unique in their own ways.

  1. Integration and Collaboration: Airtable provides better integration capabilities with other applications and platforms compared to Google Forms. With Airtable, users can easily connect their data to various apps and services, allowing for seamless data transfer and automation. On the other hand, Google Forms is tightly integrated with other Google products, making it more suitable for users already within the Google ecosystem.

  2. Data Structure and Organization: Airtable offers a more flexible and customizable data structure compared to Google Forms. Users can create relational databases in Airtable, linking related information across different tables. This allows for efficient organization and management of complex data. In contrast, Google Forms has a more straightforward structure, with responses being stored in a linear form without relational connections.

  3. Design and Customization: Airtable provides extensive design and customization options compared to Google Forms. With Airtable, users can choose from different views and layouts, apply branding and styling to their forms, and add custom fields and calculations. Google Forms, on the other hand, has limited design options and offers a more standardized look and feel.

  4. Data Analysis and Reporting: Airtable offers more advanced data analysis and reporting features compared to Google Forms. Users can use Airtable's built-in functions and formulas to perform calculations and manipulate data. It also provides various visualization options to present data in different formats. Google Forms, while offering basic data analysis capabilities, is more focused on collecting and aggregating responses rather than advanced data manipulation.

  5. Automation and Workflows: Airtable excels in workflow automation compared to Google Forms. It allows users to create custom automations and triggers based on specific conditions and events. This enables users to automate repetitive tasks and streamline their workflows. In contrast, Google Forms has limited automation capabilities and is more suited for basic data collection without extensive workflow automation.

  6. Pricing and Accessibility: Google Forms is free to use for users with a Google account, making it easily accessible and budget-friendly. Airtable, on the other hand, offers various pricing plans, including a free tier with limitations and paid plans with additional features and storage. The pricing structure of Airtable may not be suitable for all users, particularly those with limited budgets or simple data collection needs.

In summary, Airtable offers better integration capabilities, flexible data structure, extensive design options, advanced data analysis features, workflow automation, but comes with a pricing factor. On the other hand, Google Forms is more accessible, straightforward in its design, and suitable for basic data collection and aggregation within the Google ecosystem.

Advice on Airtable and Google Forms
Needs advice
on
AirtableAirtable
and
SheetsuSheetsu

I'm trying to set up an ideally "no- code" way to have a backend of 3 different tables and be able to find a value in table #3 (contains businesses & cities) by first finding a record in table #1 (7,000+ zip codes) that corresponds to a city (table #2 has the unique cities), and then finding which businesses are located in these cities ( in this specific, original zipcode lookup). And return the business and a description via an API to a front-end results page, which happens to be a WordPress page - but doesn't need to be. I've tried Airtable's API, AirPress (a finicky WordPress plugin for Airtable's API), and I've looked at Sheetsu and a similar spreadsheet as backend and a simple API. I run into the issue where they work fine when you just need to query 1 table, but when you need to use the result from that query in another query to a different table. I'm back in SQL land - where sure it could be done with SQLite - needing to probably create an intersection table or a JOIN and build an API off of that. Is there a way to accomplish what I want without going back to SQL queries and some API?

See more
Replies (2)
Max Musing
Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 5 upvotes · 55.6K views
Recommends
on
BaseDashBaseDash

You're right that there isn't a great way to join tables with Airtable's API. The closest you can get is to use a linked record field, which acts as a pointer to another record. You still end up with the problem you mentioned of having to run another query on the second table separately.

Your best bet is to stick with an actual SQL database. Using an ORM should make your life significantly easier so you don't actually have to write raw SQL. If you still want a graphical interface to your data, BaseDash lets you view and edit SQL databases just like Airtable. A full API with join support is coming soon, so that could be your perfect solution to this problem.

See more
vikas vimal
Recommends
on
IntegromatIntegromat

Let me introduce you to integromat. It connects these services without you having to work any code. And it even has a decent database built inside it.

It makes is an easy process to develop multistep workflows with multiple services and it’s free tier is surprisingly functional.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Airtable
Pros of Google Forms
  • 19
    Powerful and easy to use
  • 8
    Robust and dynamic
  • 6
    Quick UI Layer
  • 4
    Practical built in views
  • 3
    Robust API documentation
  • 0
    Great flexibility
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions