StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Alamofire vs axios

Alamofire vs axios

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Alamofire
Alamofire
Stacks196
Followers94
Votes0
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks7.6K
axios
axios
Stacks6.7K
Followers419
Votes0
GitHub Stars108.1K
Forks11.4K

Alamofire vs axios: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Alamofire and Axios, two popular HTTP client libraries for different programming languages. Both Alamofire and Axios make it easier to make HTTP requests and handle the responses, but they have some important differences that set them apart.

Now, let's explore the key differences between Alamofire and Axios.

  1. Implementation Language: Alamofire is a Swift-based library designed for iOS, macOS, tvOS, and watchOS development, whereas Axios is a JavaScript library that can be used in the browser as well as with Node.js.

  2. Library Size: In terms of file size, Axios is relatively lightweight as it focuses solely on managing HTTP requests and responses. On the other hand, Alamofire is a feature-rich library that includes additional functionalities for network reachability, progress monitoring, and task cancellation, making it a bit larger in size.

  3. Syntax: Alamofire follows a more Swift-like syntax, utilizing method chaining and expressive parameter naming conventions. Axios, being a JavaScript library, adheres to the syntax conventions of JavaScript and provides promise-based and async/await-based approaches for handling asynchronous requests.

  4. Error Handling: Alamofire uses Swift's built-in error handling mechanisms to handle errors, making it more idiomatic for Swift developers. Axios, being a JavaScript library, relies on promise rejection and catch blocks to handle errors.

  5. Platform Support: Alamofire is primarily designed for iOS, macOS, tvOS, and watchOS development, making it more suitable for Apple ecosystem projects. On the other hand, Axios is platform-agnostic and can be used both in browsers and Node.js environments, making it more versatile for web and server-side JavaScript development.

  6. Integration with Other Libraries: Alamofire integrates well with other iOS-specific libraries, such as SwiftyJSON and Codable, for JSON parsing and easy serialization/deserialization. Axios, being a JavaScript library, has a wide range of integrations with other JavaScript libraries and frameworks, making it convenient to work with tools like React, Angular, or Vue.

In summary, Alamofire is a Swift-based library primarily designed for Apple platforms, offering a more Swift-like syntax and deeper integration with iOS-specific frameworks. Axios, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library that can be used in both browser and server-side JavaScript environments, providing a lightweight and versatile approach to handle HTTP requests and responses.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Alamofire
Alamofire
axios
axios

It is a Swift-based HTTP networking library for iOS and macOS. It provides an elegant interface on top of Apple's Foundation networking stack that simplifies a number of common networking tasks.

It is a Javascript library used to make http requests from node.js or XMLHttpRequests from the browser and it supports the Promise API that is native to JS ES6.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Stars
108.1K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
11.4K
Stacks
196
Stacks
6.7K
Followers
94
Followers
419
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Alamofire, axios?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase