Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Alpine Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Alpine Linux and Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Package Manager: Alpine Linux uses the apk package manager, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux uses the yum or dnf package managers. apk is a lightweight package manager designed for embedded systems, which makes it ideal for Alpine Linux's minimalist approach. yum and dnf, on the other hand, are more feature-rich package managers that offer greater flexibility and a wider range of software packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Image Size: Alpine Linux is known for its small image size, with a base installation weighing in at only a few megabytes. This compact size is achieved by using musl libc and BusyBox, resulting in minimal resource consumption. In contrast, Red Hat Enterprise Linux has a larger base image size due to its inclusion of a broader range of system libraries and tools, making it more suitable for enterprise-grade applications.
Security: Alpine Linux has gained popularity for its strong focus on security. It uses a hardened kernel and a minimal attack surface, minimizing the potential for security vulnerabilities. Additionally, musl libc, the standard C library used by Alpine Linux, has a smaller codebase compared to glibc used by Red Hat Enterprise Linux, reducing the attack surface further. Red Hat Enterprise Linux also emphasizes security but offers a broader set of security features and tools tailored for enterprise environments.
Community Support: Alpine Linux has a smaller but active community that primarily focuses on lightweight containers and embedded systems. It provides a helpful and knowledgeable user base that is quick to address issues and offer support. Red Hat Enterprise Linux, on the other hand, benefits from a large and established community with extensive resources and enterprise support options. The broader community backing Red Hat Enterprise Linux makes it a popular choice for enterprise businesses.
Updates and Releases: Alpine Linux follows a rolling release model, meaning that package updates are continually released as soon as they are ready. This allows users to benefit from the latest software versions promptly. In contrast, Red Hat Enterprise Linux follows a more conservative and stable approach, with major releases typically occurring every three to five years. Each major release aims to provide long-term support and stability, ensuring compatibility for enterprise applications.
In Summary, Alpine Linux stands out for its lightweight and minimalistic approach, with a small image size and focus on security. It uses the apk package manager and has a more niche community. On the other hand, Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers a larger image size, a wider range of system tools and libraries, and a thriving enterprise-focused community. It uses the yum or dnf package managers and follows a more stable release cycle.
Pros of Alpine Linux
- Secure10
- Good in containers9
- Fast8
- Supports armhf, aarch64, x86, ppc64, armv7,s390x1
- Does not run glibc binaries1
- Minimal dependencies1
- Widely used in docker containers everywhere1
- Musl based1
- Choice of init system1
- Excellent Package Manager1
- Small footprint1
- Small install footprint1
- Small memory footprint1
Pros of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
- Well known1
- Paid sense of security1
- Learning curve1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Alpine Linux
- Cannot install metasploit2
- Does not run glibc binaries1
- Not for inexperienced users1
Cons of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
- Tools and package manager change over time1
- Subcription fees1
- Glibc based with many complicated hacks1
- Packages have huge dependency trees1
- Default Install is lvm1
- Anaconda1