Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Alpine Linux vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?
Alpine Linux and Ubuntu are two popular Linux distributions with distinct characteristics and use cases. Let's explore the key differences between the two:
Size and Footprint: Alpine Linux is known for its small size and minimalistic approach. It is designed to be lightweight and optimized for resource-constrained environments. The base Alpine image is significantly smaller compared to Ubuntu, making it ideal for containerized environments where efficient resource utilization is critical. On the other hand, Ubuntu is a more feature-rich distribution with a larger footprint, offering a wide range of packages and tools out-of-the-box.
Package Management: Ubuntu uses the Advanced Package Tool (APT) as its package management system, providing a vast repository of precompiled packages. These packages can be easily installed and managed using apt-get or aptitude commands. Alpine Linux utilizes its package manager called apk. The Alpine Package Keeper (APK) is optimized for Alpine's minimalistic design, using the musl libc instead of glibc for smaller package sizes and faster installation.
Security and Hardening: Alpine Linux has a strong focus on security and provides several built-in features for system hardening. It adopts a minimalistic approach by including only essential packages in its base image, reducing the attack surface. Ubuntu also emphasizes security and offers regular security updates and patches, but it has a broader package selection, which may introduce a larger attack surface if not properly managed.
Community and Support: Ubuntu has a large and active community with extensive documentation and community-driven support. It benefits from a significant user base, making it easier to find resources and get help when needed. Alpine Linux has a smaller but growing community known for its focus on minimalism and efficiency. Additionally, Alpine Linux benefits from the support of the Docker community, as it is a popular choice for containerized environments.
Use Cases: Alpine Linux's small size and minimalistic design make it well-suited for lightweight and resource-constrained environments. Ubuntu, with its larger footprint and broader package selection, is suitable for a wide range of use cases. It can be used for desktop usage, server deployments, and development environments that require a rich set of tools and libraries.
In summary, Alpine Linux offers a lightweight and minimalistic approach, optimized for resource-constrained environments and containerization. Ubuntu, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich and versatile distribution suitable for various use cases.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Alpine Linux
- Secure10
- Good in containers9
- Fast8
- Supports armhf, aarch64, x86, ppc64, armv7,s390x1
- Does not run glibc binaries1
- Minimal dependencies1
- Widely used in docker containers everywhere1
- Musl based1
- Choice of init system1
- Excellent Package Manager1
- Small footprint1
- Small install footprint1
- Small memory footprint1
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Alpine Linux
- Cannot install metasploit2
- Does not run glibc binaries1
- Not for inexperienced users1
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1