Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon API Gateway vs Google Maps: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Amazon API Gateway and Google Maps
Amazon API Gateway and Google Maps are two different services that serve distinct purposes and have several key differences:
Pricing Model: Amazon API Gateway offers a pay-per-use pricing model, where you pay for the number of API calls made and the amount of data transferred. In contrast, Google Maps has a usage-based pricing model, where you pay for the number of map loads, geocoding requests, and other specific services used.
Functionality: Amazon API Gateway is primarily designed to create, publish, and manage APIs, allowing developers to build scalable and secure backend services. It focuses on routing and transforming requests, authentication, and authorization. On the other hand, Google Maps provides a range of services related to maps, such as displaying maps, geocoding addresses, and providing directions.
Customization and Styling: Amazon API Gateway allows you to customize and define the API endpoints, methods, and request/response transformations using various programming languages and frameworks. In contrast, Google Maps provides a set of predefined styles and themes for maps, limiting the extent of customization options.
Integration Options: Amazon API Gateway supports integrating with various backend services, including AWS Lambda functions, Amazon EC2 instances, and HTTP endpoints. It enables seamless integration and scaling of different services within the AWS ecosystem. Google Maps, on the other hand, offers integration primarily with Google Cloud Platform services, limiting the integration options for other cloud providers.
Geographical Coverage: Google Maps has extensive global coverage and provides detailed mapping data and services for various countries and regions worldwide. It offers detailed street-level data and advanced features like real-time traffic information. In comparison, Amazon API Gateway does not directly provide mapping services or geographical data.
Development Ecosystem: Amazon API Gateway is part of the larger Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, which includes a wide range of services and tools for building scalable and robust applications. It leverages the extensive capabilities and integrations of AWS, enabling developers to take advantage of a comprehensive set of tools. In contrast, Google Maps is primarily focused on providing mapping services and has a more specialized development ecosystem.
In summary, Amazon API Gateway and Google Maps differ in their pricing models, functionality, customization options, integration capabilities, geographical coverage, and development ecosystems. Each service caters to distinct needs and use cases, providing developers with different tools and capabilities.
From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."
I use Mapbox because We need 3D maps and navigation, it has a great plugin for React and React Native which we use. Also the Mapbox Geocoder is great.
I use OpenStreetMap because that has a strong community. It takes some time to catch up with Google Maps, but OpenStreetMap will become great solution.
Google Maps is best because it is practically free (they give you $300 in free credits per month and it's really hard to go over the free tier unless you really mean business) and it's the best!
I use Google Maps because it has a lot of great features such as Google's rich APIs, geolocation functions, navigation search feature, street map view, auto-generated 3D city map.
I use OpenStreetMap because i have the control of the environment, using Docker containers or bare-metal servers.
Pros of Amazon API Gateway
- AWS Integration37
- Websockets7
- Serverless1
Pros of Google Maps
- Free253
- Address input through maps api136
- Sharable Directions82
- Google Earth47
- Unique46
- Custom maps designing3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon API Gateway
- No websocket broadcast2
- Less expensive1
Cons of Google Maps
- Google Attributions and logo4
- Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete1
