Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon API Gateway vs Mashery: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Amazon API Gateway and Mashery
Amazon API Gateway and Mashery are both popular tools for managing APIs, but there are several key differences between them.
Pricing Model: Amazon API Gateway follows a usage-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of API calls, data transfer, and cache usage. On the other hand, Mashery offers tiered pricing plans based on the number of API endpoints and the features required, providing more flexibility for different business needs.
Scalability: Amazon API Gateway is known for its scalability and ability to handle high traffic loads. It automatically scales resources to accommodate increased API traffic, ensuring optimal performance. In contrast, Mashery may have limitations in terms of scalability and may require additional configurations to handle high traffic volumes.
Integration with AWS Services: As part of the AWS ecosystem, Amazon API Gateway seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), and Amazon CloudWatch. This enables users to build robust serverless architectures and leverage existing AWS infrastructure. Mashery, although it offers some integrations, may not have the same level of seamless integration with AWS services.
Developer Experience: Amazon API Gateway provides a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to create and manage APIs. It also offers features like API versioning, request throttling, and caching, enhancing the developer experience. Mashery, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve and may require additional developer resources to maintain and manage APIs effectively.
Security and Authentication: Amazon API Gateway offers various authentication mechanisms, including IAM, API keys, and Amazon Cognito, to secure APIs. It also provides built-in support for generating and validating OAuth 2.0 tokens. Mashery also offers similar authentication options, but the level of customization and security features may differ.
Analytics and Monitoring: Amazon API Gateway provides comprehensive analytics and monitoring capabilities through integration with Amazon CloudWatch and AWS X-Ray. Users can monitor API usage, performance, and error rates, and gain valuable insights through various metrics and dashboards. Mashery also offers analytics and monitoring features, but the depth and integration with external monitoring tools may vary.
In summary, Amazon API Gateway and Mashery differ in their pricing model, scalability, integration with AWS services, developer experience, security, and authentication, as well as analytics and monitoring capabilities.
Pros of Amazon API Gateway
- AWS Integration37
- Websockets7
- Serverless1
Pros of Mashery
- Hard to use1
- Cheese-like1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon API Gateway
- No websocket broadcast2
- Less expensive1