Amazon API Gateway vs ReadMe Build: What are the differences?
Developers describe Amazon API Gateway as "Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale". Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management. On the other hand, ReadMe Build is detailed as "Build, deploy and share APIs & microservices easily". Build allows you to really easily move from code to deployed services without ever having to worry about provisioning, setting up and managing servers. You focus on code, we handle the rest - simple.
Amazon API Gateway and ReadMe Build can be primarily classified as "API" tools.
What is Amazon API Gateway?
What is ReadMe Build?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose ReadMe Build?
What are the cons of using Amazon API Gateway?
What are the cons of using ReadMe Build?
What companies use ReadMe Build?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
API Gateway in conjunction with Lambda has allowed us to become 'serverless'. We have a number of API endpoints that range from simple CRUD operations, through to triggering chains of complex background jobs. Like Lambda, this service has released us from getting bogged down in infrastructure management, freeing up huge amounts of time to focus on solving business problems.
It provides me with POST endpoints; I don't run servers and some third-party services need to POST data to my application.
Triggers the Lambda function from a GitHub WebHook push into
Excellent API Gateway, some quirks but most are being addressed over time, easy integration with Lambda