Amazon CloudWatch vs Chronosphere

Overview

Amazon CloudWatch

Stacks12.0K

Followers8.2K

Votes214

Chronosphere

Stacks6

Followers9

Votes0

Amazon CloudWatch vs Chronosphere: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the cloud computing landscape, Amazon CloudWatch and Chronosphere are two popular monitoring solutions that offer various features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these platforms is crucial for businesses looking to optimize their monitoring and troubleshooting processes.

Data Aggregation and Retention Policy: Amazon CloudWatch provides a default data retention policy of 15 months, whereas Chronosphere offers a highly flexible data retention policy that allows users to store data for up to 18 months. This difference in data retention can be critical for organizations with specific compliance or regulatory requirements.
Pricing Structure: Chronosphere adopts a transparent and straightforward pricing structure based on the volume of metrics ingested, while Amazon CloudWatch's pricing model can be complex and may involve additional charges for certain features or usage levels. This clarity in pricing can help businesses accurately forecast and manage their monitoring costs.
Integration Capabilities: Amazon CloudWatch seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, enabling users to monitor and analyze a wide range of cloud resources within a single platform. On the other hand, Chronosphere offers versatile integrations with both cloud-native and on-premises environments, providing users with broader monitoring capabilities across their infrastructure.
Advanced Monitoring Features: Chronosphere is known for its advanced monitoring features such as anomaly detection, predictive analytics, and complex alerting mechanisms, which offer enhanced visibility and proactive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch may require additional configurations or third-party tools to achieve similar levels of monitoring sophistication.
Scalability and Performance: Chronosphere is designed to handle high volumes of monitoring data and provides scalable solutions for enterprises with complex infrastructure needs. While Amazon CloudWatch is suitable for basic monitoring requirements, Chronosphere offers superior scalability and performance capabilities for organizations with large-scale monitoring demands.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Amazon CloudWatch and Chronosphere in terms of data retention, pricing structure, integration capabilities, advanced monitoring features, and scalability can help businesses make informed decisions when choosing a monitoring solution that aligns with their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon CloudWatch	Chronosphere
It helps you gain system-wide visibility into resource utilization, application performance, and operational health. It retrieve your monitoring data, view graphs to help take automated action based on the state of your cloud environment.	It provides a cloud-native monitoring solution that supercharges open source standard tools such as Prometheus and OpenTelemetry. It combines metrics, alerting, and distributed tracing into one seamless experience that heavily reduces both time to detection and time to mitigation, ensuring your business is up and running 24/7. Users rely on this platform to provide them with a sophisticated end-to-end solution where root causing an issue is one-click away.
Basic Monitoring for Amazon EC2 instances: ten pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Detailed Monitoring for Amazon EC2 instances: seven pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, for an additional charge.;Amazon EBS volumes: eight pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Elastic Load Balancers: thirteen pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon RDS DB instances: thirteen pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon SQS queues: eight pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon SNS topics: four pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon ElastiCache nodes: twenty-nine pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon DynamoDB tables: seven pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;AWS Storage Gateways: eleven pre-selected gateway metrics and five pre-selected storage volume metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Amazon Elastic MapReduce job flows: twenty-three pre-selected metrics at five-minute frequency, free of charge.;Auto Scaling groups: seven pre-selected metrics at one-minute frequency, optional and charged at standard pricing.;Estimated charges on your AWS bill: you can also choose to enable metrics to monitor your AWS charges. The number of metrics depends on the AWS products and services that you use, and these metrics are free of charge. Learn more about this option.	Prometheus integration; One-click ingestion path; Runs across cloud providers; Auto-dashboarding and alerting; Deep linked metrics and distributed traces
Statistics
Stacks 12.0K	Stacks 6
Followers 8.2K	Followers 9
Votes 214	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 76 Monitor aws resources 46 Zero setup 30 Detailed Monitoring 23 Backed by Amazon 19 Auto Scaling groups Cons 2 Poor Search Capabilities	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes Prometheus Grafana StatsD Google Cloud Platform Graphite

What are some alternatives to Amazon CloudWatch, Chronosphere?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Stackdriver

Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster.

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

Related Comparisons

Amazon CloudWatch vs Chronosphere: What are the differences?

Data Aggregation and Retention Policy: Amazon CloudWatch provides a default data retention policy of 15 months, whereas Chronosphere offers a highly flexible data retention policy that allows users to store data for up to 18 months. This difference in data retention can be critical for organizations with specific compliance or regulatory requirements.
Pricing Structure: Chronosphere adopts a transparent and straightforward pricing structure based on the volume of metrics ingested, while Amazon CloudWatch's pricing model can be complex and may involve additional charges for certain features or usage levels. This clarity in pricing can help businesses accurately forecast and manage their monitoring costs.
Integration Capabilities: Amazon CloudWatch seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, enabling users to monitor and analyze a wide range of cloud resources within a single platform. On the other hand, Chronosphere offers versatile integrations with both cloud-native and on-premises environments, providing users with broader monitoring capabilities across their infrastructure.
Advanced Monitoring Features: Chronosphere is known for its advanced monitoring features such as anomaly detection, predictive analytics, and complex alerting mechanisms, which offer enhanced visibility and proactive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch may require additional configurations or third-party tools to achieve similar levels of monitoring sophistication.
Scalability and Performance: Chronosphere is designed to handle high volumes of monitoring data and provides scalable solutions for enterprises with complex infrastructure needs. While Amazon CloudWatch is suitable for basic monitoring requirements, Chronosphere offers superior scalability and performance capabilities for organizations with large-scale monitoring demands.

Amazon CloudWatch vs Chronosphere

Overview