StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Amazon Cognito vs LDAP

Amazon Cognito vs LDAP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Stacks616
Followers917
Votes34
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Stacks95
Followers132
Votes0

Amazon Cognito vs LDAP: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown guide, we will highlight the key differences between Amazon Cognito and LDAP for authentication and user management systems.

  1. User Base: Amazon Cognito is primarily designed for managing user identities and access for mobile applications and web apps, whereas LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) is a protocol used for accessing and managing directory services like Microsoft Active Directory or OpenLDAP which are more enterprise-focused.

  2. Cloud vs On-Premise: Amazon Cognito is a fully managed cloud service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while LDAP typically requires on-premise infrastructure setup and maintenance. This difference impacts the operational overhead and scalability of the authentication system.

  3. Integration Options: Amazon Cognito provides seamless integration with other AWS services such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) and API Gateway, making it easy to build serverless applications. On the other hand, LDAP integration with cloud services may require additional configurations and setup.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Amazon Cognito offers automatic scaling and high availability, well-suited for applications with varying user loads, while LDAP deployments may have limitations in scalability and performance based on the hardware and configuration of the on-premise servers.

  5. Cost Structure: Amazon Cognito follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on monthly active users, providing cost predictability and flexibility for startups and enterprises. In contrast, LDAP deployments involve upfront hardware and software costs along with potential maintenance expenses, making it less cost-effective for small-scale implementations.

  6. Developer-Friendly Features: Amazon Cognito simplifies the authentication process with built-in support for social identity providers like Google and Facebook, multi-factor authentication, and user pools management, offering a developer-friendly experience. LDAP, being a protocol, may require additional third-party tools or custom development to achieve similar functionalities.

In Summary, Amazon Cognito and LDAP differ in terms of user base focus, deployment models, integration options, scalability, cost structure, and developer-friendly features for managing authentication and user identities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Cognito, OpenLDAP

Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

It is a free, open-source implementation of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Lightweight Directory Access is an application protocol that is used to crosscheck information on the server end.

Manage Unique Identities;Work Offline;Store and Sync across Devices;Seamless Guest Access;Safeguard AWS Credentials;Control Access to AWS Resources
-
Statistics
Stacks
616
Stacks
95
Followers
917
Followers
132
Votes
34
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 4
    Work Offline
  • 3
    MFA
  • 2
    Store and Sync
Cons
  • 4
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 3
    Documentation often out of date
  • 2
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
  • 1
    Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
  • 1
    MFA: there is no "forget device" function
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon Cognito, OpenLDAP?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope