StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs Apache Aurora

Amazon DynamoDB vs Apache Aurora

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora
Stacks69
Followers96
Votes0

Amazon DynamoDB vs Apache Aurora: What are the differences?

Introduction: Amazon DynamoDB and Apache Aurora are both popular database management systems, known for their unique features and capabilities. However, they differ in various aspects that cater to different use cases and requirements.

  1. Data Model: Amazon DynamoDB is a NoSQL database that offers flexible document and key-value data model, which allows for easy storage and retrieval of varied datasets. On the other hand, Apache Aurora is a relational database that follows the SQL data model, providing structured data organization and query capabilities.

  2. Scalability: Amazon DynamoDB is designed for high scalability, allowing users to easily scale their databases based on demand without compromising performance. In contrast, Apache Aurora can also scale horizontally, but it requires more manual intervention and configuration compared to DynamoDB.

  3. Workloads: Amazon DynamoDB is optimized for highly scalable and low-latency applications that require quick access to large datasets. On the contrary, Apache Aurora is well-suited for transactional workloads that involve complex queries and data relationships, making it ideal for traditional relational database use cases.

  4. Deployment: Amazon DynamoDB is a managed service provided by AWS, which takes care of infrastructure maintenance and management tasks. In contrast, Apache Aurora needs to be deployed and managed by the user on their own servers or cloud instances, giving more control but also requiring more operational overhead.

  5. Consistency: Amazon DynamoDB offers eventually consistent reads by default, which allows for higher performance but may lead to some data inconsistency in edge cases. Apache Aurora, being a relational database, provides strong consistency guarantees through multi-version concurrency control, ensuring data integrity and accuracy at all times.

  6. Fault Tolerance: Amazon DynamoDB automatically replicates data across multiple availability zones, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance in case of failures. Apache Aurora requires users to set up replication and failover mechanisms manually to achieve similar levels of fault tolerance, making it more labor-intensive in terms of disaster recovery planning.

In Summary, Amazon DynamoDB and Apache Aurora differ in their data model, scalability, workloads, deployment, consistency, and fault tolerance, catering to diverse needs in the database management space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, Apache Aurora

Doru
Doru

Solution Architect

Jun 9, 2019

ReviewonAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

1.36k views1.36k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Apache Aurora is a service scheduler that runs on top of Mesos, enabling you to run long-running services that take advantage of Mesos' scalability, fault-tolerance, and resource isolation.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
Deployment and scheduling of jobs;The abstraction a “job” to bundle and manage Mesos tasks;A rich DSL to define services;Health checking;Failure domain diversity;Instant provisioning
Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
69
Followers
3.2K
Followers
96
Votes
195
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Apache Aurora?

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Nomad

Nomad

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

Google Cloud Datastore

Google Cloud Datastore

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

CloudBoost

CloudBoost

CloudBoost.io is a database service for the “next web” - that not only does data-storage, but also search, real-time and a whole lot more which enables developers to build much richer apps with 50% less time saving them a ton of cost and helping them go to market much faster.

Firebase Realtime Database

Firebase Realtime Database

It is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync data between your users in realtime. Data is synced across all clients in realtime, and remains available when your app goes offline.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot