StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Containers As A Service
  5. Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Eureka

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Eureka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Stacks14.6K
Followers10.2K
Votes325
Eureka
Eureka
Stacks291
Followers779
Votes70
GitHub Stars12.7K
Forks3.8K

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Eureka: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Eureka. Both ECS and Eureka are popular tools used for managing containerized applications and services, but they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Scalability: Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) offers seamless scalability and high availability for containerized applications. It uses auto-scaling features and integrates well with other AWS services like Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Auto Scaling. On the other hand, Eureka also allows scaling, but it primarily focuses on service discovery and registration rather than providing built-in auto-scaling capabilities.

  2. Service Discovery: ECS provides basic service discovery functionality, allowing containers to communicate with each other within the same cluster using DNS-based service discovery. In contrast, Eureka is a dedicated service discovery tool that enables dynamic, runtime registration and discovery of microservices. It provides a service registry that allows applications to find and communicate with each other without hard-coded dependencies.

  3. Platform Support: Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It is tightly integrated with other AWS services and leverages AWS security features, such as IAM roles and resource-level permissions. On the other hand, Eureka is a standalone service discovery tool developed by Netflix, and it can be run on any platform that supports Java.

  4. Ecosystem Integration: ECS is part of the broader AWS ecosystem, which includes a wide range of services for storage, networking, security, monitoring, and management. It seamlessly integrates with other AWS services allowing you to build comprehensive solutions. Eureka, on the other hand, can be used in any Java-based ecosystem and can be integrated with other tools and frameworks that support service discovery.

  5. Community Support: Being an AWS service, ECS benefits from the extensive support and resources provided by Amazon and the large AWS community. It has comprehensive documentation, online forums, and dedicated user groups. Eureka, while being popular and widely used, relies on the Netflix community for support. The community is active, but the resources might not be as abundant as the ones available for AWS services.

  6. Pricing Model: The pricing model for ECS is based on the resources consumed by your container instances, such as EC2 instances, EBS volumes, and data transfer. It also includes the cost of other AWS services that are integrated with ECS. Eureka, being an open-source software, does not have a direct cost associated with it. However, it requires infrastructure resources to run and maintain, which should be considered in terms of operational costs.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Eureka differ in terms of scalability, service discovery capabilities, platform support, ecosystem integration, community support, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2 Container Service, Eureka

Andres
Andres

Lead Senior Software Engineer at InTouch Technology

Jun 3, 2020

Decided

If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes.
EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.

91.7k views91.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Eureka
Eureka

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Docker Compatibility;Managed Clusters;Programmatic Control;Task Definitions;Scheduler;Docker Repository
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.8K
Stacks
14.6K
Stacks
291
Followers
10.2K
Followers
779
Votes
325
Votes
70
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 100
    Backed by amazon
  • 72
    Familiar to ec2
  • 53
    Cluster based
  • 42
    Simple API
  • 26
    Iam roles
Pros
  • 21
    Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud
  • 9
    Web ui
  • 8
    Health checking
  • 8
    Monitoring
  • 7
    Circuit breaker
Cons
  • 1
    Nada
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2 Container Service, Eureka?

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Zookeeper

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Keepalived

Keepalived

The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

SkyDNS

SkyDNS

SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana