StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Amazon ElastiCache vs Amazon S3 vs Redis

Amazon ElastiCache vs Amazon S3 vs Redis

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Stacks55.1K
Followers40.2K
Votes2.0K
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.0K
Votes151
Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6

Amazon ElastiCache vs Amazon S3 vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon ElastiCache, Amazon S3, and Redis are all cloud services offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that cater to different use cases and requirements. Understanding the key differences between these services can help companies make informed decisions when choosing the right solution for their needs.

  1. Data Storage Mechanism: Amazon ElastiCache is an in-memory data store service that offers support for popular caching engines like Memcached and Redis, providing low-latency access to frequently accessed data. On the other hand, Amazon S3 is an object storage service designed for storing and retrieving large amounts of unstructured data, such as images, videos, and documents. Redis is an open-source, in-memory key-value database that is commonly used for caching and real-time analytics.

  2. Use Cases: Amazon ElastiCache is ideal for applications that require low latency and high throughput, such as real-time analytics, gaming leaderboards, and session management. Amazon S3, on the other hand, is well-suited for data archiving, backup, and disaster recovery, as well as hosting static websites and media files. Redis is often used for caching, messaging, and real-time analytics, as well as use cases that require data replication and persistence.

  3. Scaling: Amazon ElastiCache allows users to scale their cache clusters horizontally by adding or removing nodes to meet changing demands. Amazon S3 provides automatic scaling of storage capacity without requiring any manual intervention, making it a highly scalable solution for storing large amounts of data. Redis supports scaling both horizontally and vertically, enabling users to increase performance and storage capacity as needed.

  4. Data Structure: Amazon ElastiCache supports two popular caching engines - Memcached, which focuses on simplicity and speed, and Redis, which offers additional features like data structures, transactions, and persistence. Amazon S3 stores data in the form of objects, each consisting of a key, data, and metadata. Redis, being an in-memory database, supports various data types like strings, lists, sets, and sorted sets, making it a versatile solution for different use cases.

  5. Pricing Model: Amazon ElastiCache pricing is based on the cache node type and size, as well as data transfer and backup costs. Amazon S3 pricing is determined by the amount of data stored, data transfer bandwidth, and requests made to the service. Redis, being an open-source solution, offers cost-effective deployment options, but users need to consider factors like instance type, storage size, and data transfer costs.

  6. Managed Service Features: Amazon ElastiCache is a fully managed service that handles tasks like hardware provisioning, software patching, and automatic failover, ensuring high availability and reliability for the cache clusters. Amazon S3 offers features like versioning, encryption, and lifecycle policies to enhance data protection and management. Redis can be self-managed or deployed through managed services like Amazon ElastiCache, offering users flexibility in terms of control and support options.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Amazon ElastiCache, Amazon S3, and Redis in terms of data storage mechanism, use cases, scaling, data structure, pricing model, and managed service features can help companies make informed decisions when choosing the right solution for their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Amazon ElastiCache, Redis

Mohammad
Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceonBackblaze B2 Cloud StorageBackblaze B2 Cloud StoragePHPPHPLaravelLaravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

  • Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?

  • DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure

  • Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.

  • Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.

  • There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k
Comments
Dalton
Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k
Comments
Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
Redis
Redis

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

ElastiCache improves the performance of web applications by allowing you to retrieve information from fast, managed, in-memory caches, instead of relying entirely on slower disk-based databases. ElastiCache supports Memcached and Redis.

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.
Support for two engines: Memcached and Redis;Ease of management via the AWS Management Console. With a few clicks you can configure and launch instances for the engine you wish to use.;Compatibility with the specific engine protocol. This means most of the client libraries will work with the respective engines they were built for - no additional changes or tweaking required.;Detailed monitoring statistics for the engine nodes at no extra cost via Amazon CloudWatch;Pay only for the resources you consume based on node hours used
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6
Stacks
55.1K
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
61.9K
Followers
40.2K
Followers
1.0K
Followers
46.5K
Votes
2.0K
Votes
151
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
Cons
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 3
    Complex to set up
Pros
  • 58
    Redis
  • 32
    High-performance
  • 26
    Backed by amazon
  • 21
    Memcached
  • 14
    Elastic
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Amazon ElastiCache, Redis?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

MemCachier

MemCachier

MemCachier provides an easy and powerful managed caching solution for all your performance and scalability needs. It works with the ubiquitous memcache protocol so your favourite language and framework already supports it.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase