Amazon RDS vs IBM DB2

Overview

Amazon RDS

Stacks16.2K

Followers10.8K

Votes761

IBM DB2

Stacks245

Followers254

Votes19

Amazon RDS vs IBM DB2: What are the differences?

Amazon RDS and IBM DB2 are both popular options for managing relational databases, but they have key differences that set them apart in terms of features, capabilities, and deployment options.

Deployment Options: Amazon RDS offers the flexibility of deploying databases on the cloud, with options to choose from various database engines like MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server. In contrast, IBM DB2 is a traditional on-premises database management system that needs to be installed and managed on local servers.
Scalability: Amazon RDS provides automatic scaling capabilities, allowing users to easily scale up or down their database resources based on demand. It offers features like Amazon Aurora, which is a highly scalable and robust database engine. On the other hand, IBM DB2 requires manual scaling and lacks the seamless scalability options of Amazon RDS.
Ease of Management: Amazon RDS simplifies database management with automated backups, software patching, and regular maintenance tasks handled by AWS. It also offers a user-friendly web-based console for easier management. In contrast, IBM DB2 requires more manual effort and expertise for tasks like backups, software patching, and maintenance.
Availability and Reliability: Amazon RDS provides high availability by offering multiple Availability Zones (AZs) and automated backups, ensuring data redundancy and quick disaster recovery. It also offers replication options for better data durability. IBM DB2, although reliable, may require additional configuration and setup for achieving high availability and disaster recovery.
Cost Structure: Amazon RDS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources consumed. It offers options for Reserved Instances and Savings Plans, providing cost-saving opportunities. In contrast, IBM DB2 typically involves upfront licensing costs and maintenance fees, which may be less flexible in terms of cost.
Integration with Other AWS Services: Amazon RDS integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Amazon CloudWatch for monitoring, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for managing user access and permissions, and AWS CloudTrail for audit and compliance purposes. IBM DB2 may have limited integration options with other services, as it is primarily designed for on-premises deployment.

In Summary, Amazon RDS offers a cloud-native approach with easy scalability, automated management, and seamless integration with other AWS services, while IBM DB2 is a traditional on-premises database solution that requires more manual effort and expertise for management and lacks the flexibility and scalability options of Amazon RDS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon RDS	IBM DB2
Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.	DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is optimized to deliver industry-leading performance across multiple workloads, while lowering administration, storage, development, and server costs.
Pre-configured Parameters;Monitoring and Metrics;Automatic Software Patching;Automated Backups;DB Snapshots;DB Event Notifications;Multi-Availability Zone (Multi-AZ) Deployments;Provisioned IOPS;Push-Button Scaling;Automatic Host Replacement;Replication;Isolation and Security	-
Statistics
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 245
Followers 10.8K	Followers 254
Votes 761	Votes 19
Pros & Cons
Pros 165 Reliable failovers 156 Automated backups 130 Backed by amazon 92 Db snapshots 87 Multi-availability	Pros 7 Rock solid and very scalable 5 BLU Analytics is amazingly fast 2 Native XML support 2 Easy 2 Secure by default
Integrations
No integrations available	Node.js JavaScript PHP Ruby Java Python C# .NET C++ Perl

What are some alternatives to Amazon RDS, IBM DB2?

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Amazon RDS vs IBM DB2: What are the differences?

Amazon RDS and IBM DB2 are both popular options for managing relational databases, but they have key differences that set them apart in terms of features, capabilities, and deployment options.

Deployment Options: Amazon RDS offers the flexibility of deploying databases on the cloud, with options to choose from various database engines like MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server. In contrast, IBM DB2 is a traditional on-premises database management system that needs to be installed and managed on local servers.
Scalability: Amazon RDS provides automatic scaling capabilities, allowing users to easily scale up or down their database resources based on demand. It offers features like Amazon Aurora, which is a highly scalable and robust database engine. On the other hand, IBM DB2 requires manual scaling and lacks the seamless scalability options of Amazon RDS.
Ease of Management: Amazon RDS simplifies database management with automated backups, software patching, and regular maintenance tasks handled by AWS. It also offers a user-friendly web-based console for easier management. In contrast, IBM DB2 requires more manual effort and expertise for tasks like backups, software patching, and maintenance.
Availability and Reliability: Amazon RDS provides high availability by offering multiple Availability Zones (AZs) and automated backups, ensuring data redundancy and quick disaster recovery. It also offers replication options for better data durability. IBM DB2, although reliable, may require additional configuration and setup for achieving high availability and disaster recovery.
Cost Structure: Amazon RDS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources consumed. It offers options for Reserved Instances and Savings Plans, providing cost-saving opportunities. In contrast, IBM DB2 typically involves upfront licensing costs and maintenance fees, which may be less flexible in terms of cost.
Integration with Other AWS Services: Amazon RDS integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Amazon CloudWatch for monitoring, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for managing user access and permissions, and AWS CloudTrail for audit and compliance purposes. IBM DB2 may have limited integration options with other services, as it is primarily designed for on-premises deployment.

Amazon RDS vs IBM DB2

Overview