StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Amazon Timestream vs Memcached

Amazon Timestream vs Memcached

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Memcached
Memcached
Stacks7.9K
Followers5.7K
Votes473
GitHub Stars14.0K
Forks3.3K
Amazon Timestream
Amazon Timestream
Stacks13
Followers50
Votes0

Amazon Timestream vs Memcached: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon Timestream and Memcached

Amazon Timestream and Memcached are both data storage and management solutions, but they have distinct differences in their functionality and use cases. Here are the key differences between Amazon Timestream and Memcached:

  1. Data Structure: Amazon Timestream is a purpose-built time series database, designed specifically for optimizing time-stamped data storage and retrieval. It is optimized for handling large amounts of time series data with high ingestion and query rates. On the other hand, Memcached is an in-memory key-value store that can be used to cache and retrieve data quickly, without the need for disk-based storage. It is suitable for storing small to medium-sized data sets, primarily for caching purposes.

  2. Data Persistence: Amazon Timestream provides durable storage for time series data by automatically replicating data across multiple Availability Zones and maintaining long-term retention of data. It offers a scalable and highly available environment for storing and analyzing time series data over an extended period. In contrast, Memcached does not inherently provide data persistence. It is purely an in-memory caching solution, where data is stored in RAM and can be lost upon server restart or failure.

  3. Query Capabilities: Amazon Timestream offers a powerful query language called Timestream Query, which allows users to perform complex analytical queries on time series data with built-in time-based functions and operators. It supports filtering, aggregating, and downsampling of data, making it easier to extract meaningful insights from large data sets. In contrast, Memcached has limited query capabilities. It primarily supports simple key-based lookup and retrieval operations, without support for complex querying or aggregation.

  4. Scalability: Amazon Timestream is designed to handle high-scale workloads and can automatically scale its storage and compute resources based on the volume and velocity of incoming data. It provides horizontal scalability by partitioning data across multiple storage nodes, allowing for parallel processing and improved query performance. On the other hand, Memcached can also scale horizontally by adding more cache servers to distribute the data load, but scaling is primarily achieved by adding more RAM to accommodate increased data sizes.

  5. Data Access: Amazon Timestream provides fine-grained access control and supports AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for managing user permissions. It allows users to define access policies at the individual table and database level to enforce granular control over data access. In contrast, Memcached does not offer built-in access control mechanisms. It is typically accessed over a network by clients that connect to the Memcached server directly, without any authentication or authorization checks.

  6. Data Types: Amazon Timestream supports a wide range of data types, including numeric, string, boolean, timestamp, and array types, allowing for flexible representation of time series data. It also provides built-in functions for manipulating and transforming these data types. On the other hand, Memcached is primarily designed for storing and retrieving simple string values. It does not support complex data types or provide any built-in functions for data manipulation.

In Summary, Amazon Timestream is a purpose-built time series database optimized for handling large-scale time-stamped data, supporting durable storage, complex querying, scalability, fine-grained access control, and flexible data types. On the other hand, Memcached is an in-memory key-value store primarily used for caching, lacking durability, complex query capabilities, and limited data types.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Memcached
Memcached
Amazon Timestream
Amazon Timestream

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

It is a fast, scalable, and serverless time series database service for IoT and operational applications that makes it easy to store and analyze trillions of events per day up to 1,000 times faster and at as little as 1/10th the cost of relational databases. It saves you time and cost in managing the lifecycle of time series data by keeping recent data in memory and moving historical data to a cost optimized storage tier based upon user defined policies.

-
High performance at low cost; Serverless with auto-scaling; Data lifecycle management; Simplified data access; Purpose-built for time series; Always encrypted
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7.9K
Stacks
13
Followers
5.7K
Followers
50
Votes
473
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Fast object cache
  • 129
    High-performance
  • 91
    Stable
  • 65
    Mature
  • 33
    Distributed caching system
Cons
  • 2
    Only caches simple types
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Grafana
Grafana
Amazon SageMaker
Amazon SageMaker
Amazon Quicksight
Amazon Quicksight
Apache Flink
Apache Flink

What are some alternatives to Memcached, Amazon Timestream?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase