StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. AMP vs Volt

AMP vs Volt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Volt
Volt
Stacks19
Followers54
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.2K
Forks194
AMP
AMP
Stacks121
Followers63
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks4.1K

AMP vs Volt: What are the differences?

AMP vs. Volt: Key Differences Comparison

Introduction: When considering the differences between AMP and Volt, it is important to understand the distinct features and purposes of each technology.

1. **Speed**: AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) focuses on improving page load speed for mobile users, emphasizing fast loading times by utilizing optimized HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. On the other hand, Volt is a reactive web component library that allows for real-time updates without the need to reload the entire page, providing a dynamic user experience.

2. **Usage**: AMP is primarily used for creating fast-loading static web pages, ideal for content-heavy websites such as news articles or blogs. In contrast, Volt is utilized for building interactive web applications with dynamic content that needs to be updated in real-time based on user interactions, making it suitable for gaming platforms or e-commerce websites.

3. **Dependencies**: AMP provides a restricted set of components and typically does not allow custom JavaScript to maintain its optimized performance. Conversely, Volt allows developers to use a wide range of JavaScript libraries and frameworks, giving more flexibility in building complex web applications with custom functionalities.

4. **Caching**: AMP pages are served through Google's AMP Cache, which enables faster delivery and pre-rendering of content. In comparison, Volt does not have built-in caching mechanisms and relies on server configurations for handling caching of dynamic content, impacting performance based on server capabilities.

5. **Extension Ecosystem**: AMP has an extensive ecosystem of supported extensions, such as for advertising, analytics, and forms, making it convenient for integrating additional functionalities. Volt, on the other hand, offers a smaller selection of extensions but allows for more customizations and flexibility in incorporating third-party services.

6. **SEO Impact**: AMP pages are favored by search engines like Google for their fast loading speeds and mobile-friendly design, potentially improving search rankings. Meanwhile, Volt's SEO impact depends on how well developers implement server-side rendering and metadata optimization, as real-time updates may not always be favorable for search engine indexing.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between AMP and Volt is crucial for choosing the right technology based on project requirements, performance needs, and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Volt
Volt
AMP
AMP

Volt is a ruby web framework where your ruby code runs on both the server and the client (via opal.) The DOM automatically update as the user interacts with the page. Page state can be stored in the URL, if the user hits a URL directly, the HTML will first be rendered on the server for faster load times and easier indexing by search engines.

It is an open source initiative that makes it easy for publishers to create mobile-friendly content once and have it load instantly everywhere.

Instead of syncing data between the client and server via HTTP, volt uses a persistent connection between the client and server;When data is updated on one client, it is updated in the database and any other listening clients (with almost no setup code needed);Pages HTML is written in a handlebars like template language;Volt uses data flow/reactive programming to automatically and intelligently propagate changes to the DOM (or anything other code wanting to know when a value updates)
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.2K
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Forks
194
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
19
Stacks
121
Followers
54
Followers
63
Votes
26
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Rich web applications
  • 3
    Holy Grail (Server-Client)
  • 3
    Reactive Web Framework
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    Ruby client side
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Volt, AMP?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase