StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Data Science Tools
  5. Anaconda vs Jupyter

Anaconda vs Jupyter

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Anaconda
Anaconda
Stacks440
Followers490
Votes0
Jupyter
Jupyter
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.4K
Votes57
GitHub Stars12.7K
Forks5.5K

Anaconda vs Jupyter: What are the differences?

Introduction

Anaconda and Jupyter are two popular tools in the field of data science and programming. Both Anaconda and Jupyter are widely used for data analysis, scientific computing, and machine learning tasks. However, they have distinct differences that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Installation and Environment Management: One key difference between Anaconda and Jupyter is that Anaconda is an open-source distribution of Python and R programming languages, which includes a package manager and a complete set of libraries and dependencies. On the other hand, Jupyter is an interactive notebook interface that can be used with different programming languages, including Python, R, and Julia. While Anaconda provides a comprehensive environment for managing packages and libraries, Jupyter focuses on providing an interface for creating and sharing interactive notebooks.

  2. Notebook Interface vs. Package Manager: Anaconda provides a command-line tool called conda, which allows users to manage packages, dependencies, and environments. With conda, users can easily create isolated environments for different projects and manage the installation of packages and libraries. In contrast, Jupyter provides a web-based interface called Jupyter Notebook, which allows users to create and edit notebooks containing code, interactive visualizations, and explanatory text. Jupyter Notebook provides an interactive environment for data exploration, experimentation, and analysis.

  3. Interactivity and Collaboration: Another key difference between Anaconda and Jupyter is their level of interactivity and collaboration. Anaconda focuses on creating a complete data science environment with tools like Jupyter, Spyder, and RStudio. While Jupyter Notebook allows users to create interactive code cells, markdown cells, and visualizations, it is primarily designed for individual use. On the other hand, JupyterLab, the next-generation web-based interface for Jupyter, provides a more flexible and collaborative environment by allowing users to arrange multiple notebooks, code consoles, and file browsers in a single tab.

  4. Package Support and Community: Anaconda is known for its extensive collection of pre-installed packages, libraries, and tools for data science and machine learning tasks. It provides a curated repository called Anaconda Cloud, where users can find and install packages and share their own packages and projects. Jupyter, on the other hand, has a rich ecosystem of extensions and kernels that can be used to customize and extend the functionality of Jupyter Notebook and JupyterLab. The Jupyter community actively develops and maintains a wide range of extensions, kernels, and plugins, making it easy for users to enhance and customize their Jupyter environment.

  5. Execution Environment: Anaconda provides a unified environment for executing code in a variety of contexts, including batch scripts, interactive shells, integrated development environments (IDEs), and web interfaces. Anaconda supports different execution modes, such as running code in a traditional command-line interface, using an integrated development environment like Spyder, or executing code in a Jupyter Notebook or JupyterLab. Jupyter, on the other hand, is primarily designed for interactive and exploratory data analysis, allowing users to execute code in a notebook-like interface and visualize the results immediately.

  6. Deployment and Production Use: Anaconda provides tools and services for deploying and managing data science models in production environments. With Anaconda, users can easily package their code, dependencies, and trained models into a deployable format and deploy them on various platforms, such as cloud infrastructure, edge devices, and containerized environments. Jupyter, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for production use. While Jupyter notebooks can be converted into other formats, such as scripts or HTML files, the primary focus of Jupyter is on interactive and exploratory data analysis rather than deployment.

In summary, Anaconda is an open-source distribution of Python and R programming languages with a package manager and a comprehensive set of libraries, while Jupyter is an interactive notebook interface that can be used with multiple programming languages and provides a web-based environment for creating and sharing interactive notebooks. Anaconda focuses on providing a complete data science environment and tools for managing packages and dependencies, while Jupyter focuses on interactive data analysis and visualization in a notebook-like interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Anaconda
Anaconda
Jupyter
Jupyter

A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.

The Jupyter Notebook is a web-based interactive computing platform. The notebook combines live code, equations, narrative text, visualizations, interactive dashboards and other media.

Stay safe and secure; Deliver on your data strategy; Get to market faster; Maximize flexibility and control
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
440
Stacks
3.4K
Followers
490
Followers
1.4K
Votes
0
Votes
57
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 19
    In-line code execution using blocks
  • 11
    In-line graphing support
  • 8
    Can be themed
  • 7
    Multiple kernel support
  • 3
    Best web-browser IDE for Python
Integrations
Python
Python
PyCharm
PyCharm
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Atom-IDE
Atom-IDE
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
GitHub
GitHub
scikit-learn
scikit-learn
Scala
Scala
Python
Python
Dropbox
Dropbox
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Pandas
Pandas
TensorFlow
TensorFlow
R Language
R Language
ggplot2
ggplot2

What are some alternatives to Anaconda, Jupyter?

Apache Zeppelin

Apache Zeppelin

A web-based notebook that enables interactive data analytics. You can make beautiful data-driven, interactive and collaborative documents with SQL, Scala and more.

Pandas

Pandas

Flexible and powerful data analysis / manipulation library for Python, providing labeled data structures similar to R data.frame objects, statistical functions, and much more.

NumPy

NumPy

Besides its obvious scientific uses, NumPy can also be used as an efficient multi-dimensional container of generic data. Arbitrary data-types can be defined. This allows NumPy to seamlessly and speedily integrate with a wide variety of databases.

Deepnote

Deepnote

Deepnote is building the best data science notebook for teams. In the notebook, users can connect their data, explore and analyze it with real-time collaboration and versioning, and easily share and present the polished assets to end users.

PyXLL

PyXLL

Integrate Python into Microsoft Excel. Use Excel as your user-facing front-end with calculations, business logic and data access powered by Python. Works with all 3rd party and open source Python packages. No need to write any VBA!

CBDC Resources

CBDC Resources

CBDC Resources is a data and analytics platform that centralizes global information on Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) projects. It provides structured datasets, interactive visualizations, and technology-oriented insights used by fintech developers, analysts, and research teams. The platform aggregates official documents, technical specifications, and implementation details from institutions such as the IMF, BIS, ECB, and national central banks. Developers and product teams use CBDC Resources to integrate CBDC data into research workflows, dashboards, risk models, and fintech applications. Website : https://cbdcresources.com/

SciPy

SciPy

Python-based ecosystem of open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering. It contains modules for optimization, linear algebra, integration, interpolation, special functions, FFT, signal and image processing, ODE solvers and other tasks common in science and engineering.

Dataform

Dataform

Dataform helps you manage all data processes in your cloud data warehouse. Publish tables, write data tests and automate complex SQL workflows in a few minutes, so you can spend more time on analytics and less time managing infrastructure.

PySpark

PySpark

It is the collaboration of Apache Spark and Python. it is a Python API for Spark that lets you harness the simplicity of Python and the power of Apache Spark in order to tame Big Data.

Dask

Dask

It is a versatile tool that supports a variety of workloads. It is composed of two parts: Dynamic task scheduling optimized for computation. This is similar to Airflow, Luigi, Celery, or Make, but optimized for interactive computational workloads. Big Data collections like parallel arrays, dataframes, and lists that extend common interfaces like NumPy, Pandas, or Python iterators to larger-than-memory or distributed environments. These parallel collections run on top of dynamic task schedulers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase