StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Angular Universal vs Material Design for Angular

Angular Universal vs Material Design for Angular

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Angular Universal
Angular Universal
Stacks329
Followers413
Votes36
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K

Angular Universal vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Introduction

Angular Universal and Material Design for Angular are two important frameworks in web development. While Angular Universal is a tool for server-side rendering, Material Design for Angular provides a set of pre-designed components and styles. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Server-Side Rendering vs Component Library: Angular Universal is primarily focused on server-side rendering (SSR) of Angular applications. It allows rendering Angular applications on the server before sending them to the client, enhancing the initial loading speed and facilitating SEO. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular is a component library that provides a set of pre-designed UI components and styles, helping developers create consistent and visually appealing user interfaces.

  2. Performance Optimization vs Visual Design: Angular Universal mainly targets performance optimization by rendering pages on the server. With SSR, the content is readily available for the user, reducing the time taken for initial rendering. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, focuses on enhancing the visual design of Angular applications with pre-built components that follow the Material Design guidelines.

  3. SEO Enhancement vs UI Consistency: Angular Universal improves search engine optimization (SEO) by serving prerendered HTML to search engine crawlers. This helps search engines easily index the content and improve the visibility of the application on search engine result pages. Material Design for Angular, while it promotes UI consistency, doesn't directly contribute to SEO improvement.

  4. Backend Integration vs Frontend Styling: Angular Universal provides capabilities for server-side rendering, helping with backend integration and rendering dynamic content. It can fetch data from APIs or databases on the server and include it in the rendered HTML. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, focuses on frontend styling and user interface, providing ready-to-use components like buttons, cards, and forms.

  5. Improved Time-to-First-Content vs Enhanced User Experience: Angular Universal significantly improves the time-to-first-content metric as the rendered HTML is already available, reducing the need for client-side rendering. This enhances the initial page loading speed, resulting in a better user experience. Material Design for Angular contributes to the user experience by providing visually pleasing and user-friendly UI components.

  6. Cross-Platform Compatibility vs Visual Customization: Angular Universal allows applications to be rendered on different platforms, including web browsers, mobile devices, and even server-side environments. It provides a consistent rendering experience across platforms. Material Design for Angular focuses on visual customization, offering a set of themes and custom styles to adapt the UI according to the project's branding and requirements.

In summary, Angular Universal is primarily focused on server-side rendering for performance optimization and SEO enhancement, while Material Design for Angular provides a component library focused on UI consistency and visual design customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Angular Universal
Angular Universal

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

-
server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
26.7K
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
329
Followers
9.6K
Followers
413
Votes
522
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript
  • 5
    Complete Framework
  • 5
    Server rendering and code splitting
  • 4
    Dynamic rendering
  • 4
    Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
.NET Core
.NET Core
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Angular Universal?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase