StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Angular Universal vs Materialize

Angular Universal vs Materialize

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
Angular Universal
Angular Universal
Stacks329
Followers413
Votes36
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K

Angular Universal vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Developers describe Angular Universal as "A technology that renders Angular applications on the server". It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive. On the other hand, Materialize is detailed as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design.

Angular Universal and Materialize are primarily classified as "JavaScript Framework Components" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.

Angular Universal and Materialize are both open source tools. Angular Universal with 50.1K GitHub stars and 13.9K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Materialize with 36.2K GitHub stars and 4.83K GitHub forks.

The3ballsoft, GeoLytix, and Avhana Health are some of the popular companies that use Materialize, whereas Angular Universal is used by Garlic Tech Ltd, Simian, and IVALO. Materialize has a broader approval, being mentioned in 63 company stacks & 378 developers stacks; compared to Angular Universal, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
Angular Universal
Angular Universal

A CSS Framework based on material design.

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
26.7K
Stacks
698
Stacks
329
Followers
1.2K
Followers
413
Votes
557
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript
  • 5
    Server rendering and code splitting
  • 5
    Complete Framework
  • 4
    Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR
  • 4
    Static site generator
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET Core
.NET Core
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Angular Universal?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase